HANK PHILLIPPI RYAN: Woohoo, and ruffles and flourishes! Today we welcome, with great fanfare, one of the dearest and best friends of the Reds, the brilliant and incomparable Catriona McPherson. A blazingly good writer, and infinitely hilarious, her books are consistently terrific--thoughtful and funny and twisty.
I don't know how she does it. Some of her books are so deeply dark and literary and thought provoking that they will break your heart (and your brain, too), and others are laugh-out-loud funny.
Today, she offers a confession.
Confessions of a Philistine
In Scot’s Eggs, the eighth Last Ditch Motel mystery, the fluffy-soft, pastel-shaded innocence of an Easter holiday in Cuento, CA, is somewhat spoiled by the murder of two tourists and especially by the crime scene, which is a vintage Mustang full – like seriously full – of their blood. It’s been left in the hot sun for a week until the arrival of the turkey vultures makes someone take a closer look.
Why’d it take a week? Because the killers parked it outside the brand new art museum on the UCC campus, where the curators mistook it for the early arrival of the promised work by a young creator from an Oakland collective, who’s long been interested in decay.
I can’t lie; I had a lot of fun writing the employees of the Patsy Denoni Cultural Center and their combination of aching earnestness and corporate lock-step. Here’s just a flavour.
Fern had arrived at our side. ‘These resources are free and there is no entry charge,” she said. ‘But we encourage you to make a small donation to support our work in celebrating, promoting and protecting the diverse practices of artistic expression by the families of peoples who comprise our communities.’
Before any of us could answer, another woman came our way, stalking across the polished marble in spike heels. It took some kind of confidence to walk that fast in those shoes on this surface, but she was being powered by irritation.
‘Diverse expressions of artistic practice, Fern,’ she said. ‘The communities of peoples who comprise our family. Wait.’ She coloured slightly. ‘Diverse communities of expressive practice, to protect the arts of-’ She sniffed. ‘We suggest fifty dollars.’
I had even more fun describing the art itself, but it’s too gross for this blog. (Yes, I know I described a Mustang full of blood. The actual art is worse.) As ever, I need to say that the opinions expressed – here regarding the collection – are those of the fictional Lexy Campbell, nothing to do with me.
Ahem.
Honestly?
Every so often an exhibition of conceptual art blows me away completely. I saw a dozen pieces at the Serpentine in London a few years back that still haunt me – hyper-realistic and disturbing – and there’s a sliced-apart full-size house at Tate Modern with a film of 1950s DIY leaflets playing in the slices that . . . maybe you have to be there but it’s amazing. Also, I think Shedboatshed – the wee huttie dismantled, turned into a boat, sailed to the museum and reassembled into a shed again thoroughly deserved its Turner Prize. And I’ve got a lot of time for Tracy Emin. Even her Bed.
But.
The pile of wrapped sweeties (US hard candy?) in the all-white room in the National Gallery that the museum-goers are supposed to help themselves from? (And presumably suck as they walk round the rest of the exhibition? Dropping the wrappers?) It doesn’t work. There’s a security guard on duty. Who’s going to eat the art when there’s a guy in a uniform watching?
And in another room of that same exhibition, we read the card and peered about looking for the art for ages, wondering if someone had stolen it, before we realised it was the light fixture plugged in low down on one wall and tacked up and across the ceiling.
“Okay,” I remember Neil saying. “So we’re in one of those ‘But what is Art?’ exhibitions.” He cleared his throat. “So. What is Art?” There was a long silence then someone behind us whispered “You forgot to say Hey, Siri.” So we weren’t the only Philistines in there that day.
Look, I’m not saying it’s not an interesting question. (Seriously, what is Art?) only that you can’t necessarily stand in front of a pile of sweeties, ask yourself what art is for a while, then move on, ask it again underneath a light fixture, and on again and on and on, in front of, under, on top of, or sucking on another fifteen or twenty works. At some point you start wondering if the café’s any good. I do.
How about you, Jungle Red readers? Are you big fans of conceptual art? If so, have you lost any respect you ever had for me? I might as well put the cherry on top and tell you that my favourite artist is Rembrandt Harmenszoon Van Rijn then. Mostly because he painted women with love and tenderness, not as if he’d simply scoured the Bible for any page where someone’s dress fell off. And his unflinching gaze at his aging self makes me want to give him a cuddle.
HANK PHILLIPPI RYAN: See, Reds and readers, easy question today: what is Art?
(This always reminds me of when my editor and I were discussing one of my book covers.
She said: I’ll tell Art what you said.
I said: Great, tell him I appreciate it.
And she said, no, there’s no Art, I meant the art department.
I mean, how’m I supposed to know that? But that’s a question of WHO is Art. Not today’s question, which is: WHAT is art. See? Weigh in, Reds and readers!

.jpg)

It's lovely to have you here at Jungle Reds once again, Catriona . . . After reading this, I'm definitely looking forward to reading "Scot's Eggs" . . . .
ReplyDeleteWhat is Art? I'm sure everyone has a different opinion, so I'm going to say that I am quite Traditional in my artistic likes, but Art is, like most everything else, in the eye of the beholder . . . .
Thank you, Joan. I walked over the Oroville Dam and back on Saturday and there were lots of huge messages spelled out with pebbles down on the banks. None of them were names, or proposals, or any other kind of obvious slogan and I did wonder if it was an artistic tradition - or if they *had* been clearer messages and some prankster had altered them, and if *that* was an artistic decision. All in all, it added greatly to the outing!
DeleteTurner prize sounds familiar to me since Alexander McCall Smith mentioned it in his Scotland street stories.
ReplyDeleteThat’s funny about who is art / what is art because it reminds me of the joke about American Sign Language 🤟 and British sign language. British person asks “what?” And the American thinks they are asking “where?”
SIgn language jokes. I love this.
DeleteI'm fascinated by ASL and BSL. I remember thinking "Why didn't they just make one?" and then learning that the two languages evolved like other real languages.
DeleteProbably my favorite part of the Tate Modern is that they played the hum of the long-gone turbines in the Great Hall.
ReplyDeleteWhoa, and it was empty? That's great.
DeleteIt's an amazing building - no matter what's inside it. Like the Guggenheim or the Hirshorn.
DeleteArt is definitely in the eyes of the beholder. I like any art that *moves* me.
ReplyDeleteSO agree!
DeleteI definitely tend towards the beautiful or majestic. Wait - or intricate. I did once see a toddler at the Gallery of Modern Art in Edinburgh look at a huge Francis Bacon portrait (a "pope", I think) and burst into sobs. I remember thinking the artist would have been thrilled.
DeleteCatriona, how wonderful to have you here making me giggle before breakfast!
ReplyDeleteOne sunny afternoon in London ,we wandered into the Tate, and wandered out again looking for something to eat.
Good to know that we aren't the only ones snort laughing at the museum.
I'm looking forward to reading SCOT'S EGGS.
You never know, right?
DeleteAs you're all making me think about this again, I'm starting to wonder if maybe I just look at it wrongly. Instead of thinking I should have some reaction to every piece, maybe . . . just wander round and then wander out. I mean, it's not as if every view of Venice in a traditional museum would blow your mind, right?
DeleteWhat is art?
ReplyDeleteSo many things come to mind, and I’ve thought of one or another of them at times.
For me, the best example is art is a picture or a piece of music or a turn of phrase, maybe just a word, that stops me in my tracks. Something I return to again and again seeing hearing feeling something new each time.
Indescribable.
Congratulations Catriona. I’m looking forward to reading the eighth entry in the Last Ditch trilogy, which arrives the day before my birthday. Coincidence? Probably. Xo
DeleteYes when the art changes you in some way. Exactly.
DeleteI'd like to live in a city - instead of up a dirt road - so I could go and visit a permanent collection regularly, to keep looking at things over time. Eh, I'll have to make do with nature and the seasons and all that. (Brown season is over and green season is here!)
DeleteLovely definition, Ann.
DeleteI've visited a couple of unusual art museums. In Baltimore, the American Visionary Art Museum has some delightful and odd pieces, like the giant ball made entirely of bras. It made me want to slip mine off and add it on the spot. Mass Museum of Contemporary Art in North Adams has some amazing installations - some of the buildings are enormous and can fit huge wall paintings (I can't remember the artist's name right now) and sculptures. Stunning.
ReplyDeleteBut a bowl of candy? No thanks. I can't wait for the new book, Catriona - my copy is preordered!
Also, I enjoyed watching Jenn interview Rhys and Julia last night - fun!
DeleteAnd I was there! Laughing the most when Rhys got a bit naughty. LOL
DeleteI pictured you in the audience, Karen!
DeleteThe big bra ball makes me think of the exhibition here recently where an artist made horses out of beach litter. I didn't get it, necessarily, but they were very clever and arresting.
DeleteEdith, you made me almost spit out my tea with your slipping off your bra comment!
DeleteOops, that last comment was from me, Pat S.
DeleteThis is hilarious Catriona! I studied surrealism in college, and I still have trouble explaining one of their artworks to John. A light fixture? Nope.
ReplyDeleteThat made me laugh - a surrealism module, but you still had to hand in papers like there was no surrealism?
DeleteYes, exactly exactly!
DeleteI mean--that's what I thought, too ,Catriona. Hilarious.
DeleteYes papers were due! No automatic pen either:)
DeleteWhen I was in college (over at Sonoma State) my three best friends were dual Art/ English majors (I was just an English major - not as ambitious). So I was taken all over the Bay Area to every museum imaginable, with plenty of art I didn’t “get” - but it was useful to have them by my side to “explain “ what was going on. So, while now after years of exposure, I can really appreciate meditating on a Clifford Still abstract, my fav artists are still Caravaggio and the pre-Raphelites. They move me, every time, and the current trend of “is this art” generally doesn’t. So that tends to be my bar= Does This Move Me? (for the positive or negative).
ReplyDeleteI'm really learning a lot from this comment section. I think I ask a lot of conceptual art because it seems there should be some compensation for the fact that it took no particular skill to produce the piece. I might not be moved by the skinny dead people in the mediaeval section of the museum but there's talent on display. Yes! I really think I'm getting somewhere. When there's no manual skill *and* there's no emotional heft . . . that's when I feel as if I've gone round a revolving door and ended up on the street again.
DeleteAh, Catriona, the revolving door would work then you'd be part of the installation! Perfect!
DeleteOr an extra in ELF - one or the other!
DeleteThis is so hilarious, especially "You forgot to say Hey Siri". Still chuckling. I too love Rembrandt, also the Impressionists. We read a biography of Leonora Carrington for Spanish class and some of her work was very interesting; other pieces not so much. I haven't really experienced 'conceptual art' --except perhaps one time. My son and I took the train to San Francisco to see "Graced with Light" at Grace Cathedral. The artist, Anne Patterson, hung nearly 20 miles of ribbon from the vaulted ceiling and arches. She envisioned "a series of light pathways, connecting heaven and earth, manifest as ribbons. The ribbons carry our prayers, dreams and wishes skyward, an in turn, grace streams down the ribbons to us." It was truly spectacular. I'm glad I made the effort to see it.
ReplyDeleteI got to see the Gates exhibit in Central Park about twenty years ago. Christo and Jeanne-Claude hung orange cloth "gates" throughout the park. Stunning.
DeleteAn artist friend spent a month in the city to help with that installation, Edith! I would have loved to experience it.
DeleteThat sounds amazing too, Edith and Karen!
DeleteYes! When it's grand and soaring, it's something quite different from when it's . . . that light fixture. (For me (the Philistine.))
DeleteLate afternoon, still laughing.
Deletewelcome back Catriona, waving shyly to an artist.
ReplyDeleteArt is the realm of possibilities waiting to be uncovered. All the glory and the darkness, fierce and holy: scents, sounds, textures, images both seen with eyes and mind. The creations by humans that have led us up and down for the last 35000 years.
Brilliant!
DeleteWell, I can't argue with that! Nor would I want to - thank you.
DeleteCatriona, as usual, you had me laughing. A friend had an expression about art that takes itself way too seriously: precious.
ReplyDeleteThere is a Rembrandt at the Taft Museum in Cincinnati, "Man Rising From a Chair" that I am drawn to every time I'm there. It's paired with another, similar but more static painting by I think Frans Hals, and it's fascinating to compare them.
So what is art. Back in the 1990s quilted clothing/"wearable art" was all the rage, especially vests. Some of them were well done, with beautiful patterns and color combinations, but the wearer had to be a certain type to be able to pull off the look successfully. There were contests and fashion shows. My friend Kenneth King, who designed exquisite and highly embellished gowns and accessories (including some three dozen hats for Elton John), called most of the art to wear "art to embarrass yourself in".
I prefer to think it's a matter of taste and personal emotion. My neighbors' collection of Coca-Cola memorabilia means as much to them as another friend's lovely marble replica of Antonio Canova's Psyche Revived by Cupid's Kiss means to her. Who's to say?
I'll meet you at the cafe. Then a turn around the gift shop.
Cincinnati is a seriously unserious art town. We have hundreds of murals on buildings and other permanent public art, but every two years Blink! Festival takes over most of downtown (and last year it spilled over the river and into Northern Kentucky) with lights, music, parades, and photomapped videos playing on buildings. Lots of interactive displays, too. For three nights the city is turned into a wonderland.
DeleteKaren, I *will* meet you in the gift shop for another installment of my lifelong experience of there never (ever!) being a postcard of the thing I liked best in the exhibition. Not once. Anon, that sounds wonderful - the sheer overload of turning the whole city into one big piece of art!
DeleteThe Anon above was also me. It is really an amazing experience, akin to those immersive Van Gogh installations, but for blocks and blocks.
DeleteWow, Coralee! After that my simple comments are feeling woefully puny. Still, to me art is something that I see and it stays with me. It moves me in some way, either to the toilet or it fills my soul with possibilities. Our city is part of SculpTour and this summer they switched the art pieces out for new arrivals. I love walking amongst these works - they are all outdoor art pieces - and marveling at what moved an artist so deeply that they strove to capture it in an artistic form. I especially love the piece that has been purchased by a donor and sits outside our library branch. It is a bench held up by books and the titles were chosen by folks who use the library. Talk about participating in the arts! -- Victoria
ReplyDeleteVictoria, that sounds lovely. In an earlier Last Ditch novel, I had them all go to Edinburgh for Christmas. The US visitors wanted to know who all the sculptures were of and Lexy, the native Scot, told them "guy on a horse, guy in a robe, guy in a robe on a horse" - which pretty much sums up Edinburgh's public art. There is one bear . . . Wojtek.
DeleteSix years ago husband and I took our granddaughter to London as a HS graduation gift. After seeing the Globe we decided to check out the Tate Modern. Jeez looeeze. We kept looking for the "good" stuff. Only found the dumb stuff. We gave up before checking out the other building. On the other hand the Houston MFA got in a huge display called The Big Bamboo. The artist and his helpers built a huge jungle gym (my description) from bamboo with bridges, walkways, tunnels, etc that we visitors could enter and walk on. It was great!
ReplyDeleteYour "giving up before the other buildings" made me laugh. Neil and I used to always start at the start of national collections, but we never got to see modernists because, by the time I'd looked at the skinny dead people, the fat ladies with their clothes falling off, those Dutch people in black hats, the melted landscapes, the ballet dancers and the smudgy ones . . . my eyes were full.
DeleteSO great to see you, Catriona! Many smooches. Trying to think of art I've seen that was--unlikely. The Mass Museum of Contemporary art where we go every summer has some thought-provoking things.. Like a stand of real trees growing upside down. To make us think--what is a tree? LIke the Magritte apple.
ReplyDeleteOr any surrealist art--it's supposed to tear down the way we usually see the world, and see it through some other eyes. Isn't there an installation somewhere that's just a billion forks? Is that beautiful for itself, or does it change because its forks? Is it about conspicuous consumption, or recycling or food envy? Some graffiti is (are?) fabulous, and sometimes you can't tell is an artist drew something or a little kid.
Rothko, too, is that genius or just swatches of color? But I guess if you think about it or talk about it...that's good. Sometimes you feel like you you "get" something, and even better, sometimes it feels like something got YOU.
I think it might be because it's a *billion* forks - like the big bra ball, the park ribbon, and the bamboo (see above!). Re. Rothko . . . the Great British Sewing Bee had the contestants recreate a shift dress that Biba designed, based on Rothko, and it was very easy to tell the difference between those who understood how the blocks of colour worked together and those who didn't
DeleteIf an artist just--goes for it. All out. The Great British Sewing Bee--WHAT IS THIS THING you speak of, I have not heard of this and need to watch it now. And that's fascinating about the Rothko. Is the shift a Rothko, or a Mondrian? Color blocks, but not the same.
Deleteawwww, yeah - might well have been Mondrian. I'm on safer ground with telly - Roku channel: bake off but with sewing machines instead of foodmixers.
DeleteAnd got to admit--its pretty amazing and inspirational that human beings are the only creatures who can make "art"--out of nothing but our own imaginations and passion and joy and expression. So that's something to consider.
ReplyDeleteI mean--a spider can make a beautiful web, but is that why it does it? Do they decide to make them "beautiful" as they use them to catch foo? Or is it beautiful because we choose to see it that way?
Right? Do hermit crabs know? I hope tigers don't know they are beautiful, because that would mean possums know they're . . . possums.
DeleteOh, right. ..can of worms. Oh, and they would know they are worms. ANd "I hope tigers don't knwo they are beautiful" is the best opening line for a novel, just saying.
DeleteLove love the 'Hey Siri" comment! I would definitely agree that art should move the viewer/participant. My favorite conceptual art pieces: the Viet Nam Memorial Wall by Maya Lin--totally unexpected, yet powerful. And Janet Cardiff's Forty-Part Motet--an installation of 40 speakers, each focused on one voice from Thomas Tallis' piece of music from the 1500s. I heard this in the Cleveland Art Museum, with benches placed in the room with the speakers, but also, the music could be heard throughout the galleries. It was a wondrous experience, deeply moving.
ReplyDeleteI see I have some catching up to do with the inhabitants of the Last Ditch Motel, Catriona--and I could some laughter!
All of the memorials in DC (where I spent three months last year) moved me individually and -even more so - collectively/comparatively. The change from Jefferson to Roosevelt to MLK as you walk along that riverbank . . .
DeleteThank you, Hank - again! - for hosting Lexy and me and for your very kind comments. Now, I'm going to see what everyone's saying . . . Cx
ReplyDeleteAs an artist, I think art makes you feel something. For me, personally, I prefer art that makes me feel or think or see something good, or deep, or even uncomfortable. I like to be amazed, or thinking something I’ve not thought before. I’m not so sure about installation art. Some of it is brilliant, but if it’s lurid I don’t care for it (I would not go for decay art!). The light fixture and the pile of sweeties would not make me feel anything, I’m afraid
ReplyDeleteWell see, I feel a bit validated now that an artist has said this! I can see that if we had all done what the artist wanted and eaten them maybe there would have been something going on . . .
DeleteWe took our college aged son to DC a few years back. We were at the Spy Museum, getting ready to leave and saw that it was pouring outside. We were trying to decide where to go next when our son peered through the weather and said, “Isn’t that the National Portrait Gallery across the street? Let’s go there!” So he took his knuckle-dragging parents who knew very little about art to be schooled! (The National Portrait Gallery is in the same building as the Smithsonian American Art Museum so we finished one and wandered into the other.) I was so proud of our “boy”, at that point 20 years old, who had taken an AP Art History class for fun in high school and truly enjoyed all that he saw that day. He found me at one point (we’d all three gone our separate ways) to take his picture in front of Nam June Paik’s Electronic Superhighway. He wanted to send it to his Art History teacher because she had featured that in his class.
ReplyDeleteI bow to much more eloquent people (looking at you, Coralee!) to discuss what is art. All I can say is that day (and later repeated when we went to the Art Institute of Chicago with him), I enjoyed the art I saw, but mostly loved seeing my son’s complete enjoyment of what HE saw. — Pat S
I spent a lot of time in that place last year, Pat.
DeleteHi Catriona and congrats on another Last Ditch!! Everyone has been so eloquent today that I feel inadequate to comment, but I agree that art should make you feel something, and that--for me, at least--art should require some effort on the part of the artist. A bowl of candy or a light fixture would just not do it for this Philistine. Also, I am hugely embarrassed to admit that I have never been in the Tate Modern! It is always on my London list, but there's the National Gallery, and the National Portrait Gallery, and the Tate, etc., etc. Maybe next time!
ReplyDeleteAnd there's the Wallace Collection . . .
DeleteWhen we were in Glasgow last spring we spent a delightful afternoon wandering through the Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum, where an exhibit called Floating Heads by a woman named Sophie Cave delighted me to no end. Here is an article about it, with photos (hope it's okay to post this link) https://mymodernmet.com/floating-heads-10-pics/
ReplyDeleteWill check it out, Brenda
DeleteIt was fabulous!
DeleteWelcome, Catriona. If you're a Philistine, so am I. I much prefer looking at something where I know what I'm looking at instead of, oh, a blue square/yellow triangle/red circle on a white background or, as you say, a pile of sweets I'm supposed to munch. No thanks. Bring on the Rembrandt.
ReplyDeleteI quite like a lot of abstract stuff, though.
DeleteLove your comments and some of the How Can This Be Art? examples. There is good conceptual art but...I was at SFMOMA one day and there was a pencil of the pristine white floor next to an installation piece. People were examining it with dead seriousness until a red-faced docent came over and picked it up. "I knew I'd dropped it," she mumbled, "but not where." Aside: I like the real UCD Museum more than you do, I think, mainly because Thiebault, de Forest and the other university professors of that generation!
ReplyDeletethe Manetti Shrem? I love that place! (I'm really not Lexy!)
DeleteConceptual art has long escaped me - if I have to read the tag alongside it on the gallery wall to “get it” … fortunately Catriona’s books are terrific and funny and do not have to be ‘splained
ReplyDeleteI like going round galleries (US museums) making stuff up instead of reading the cards. I name all the untitled works, for a start.
DeleteThank you, Hank, and everyone for the warm welcome and lively discussion, Cx
ReplyDeleteOh, yay! I'm so excited for another Last Ditch Motel mystery. Life just got infinitely better! Sorry I'm so late to the party - deadline! Ugh.
ReplyDeleteI just realised Gmail was spam-zoning my alerts! Good luck with your deadline.
Delete