JULIA SPENCER-FLEMING: I knew for a long time that Book No. 10 (working
title AT MIDNIGHT COMES THE CRY) would have a conflict between the
protagonists of my series – plus a few
newcomers – and white
supremacists. I follow the news closely, and white supremacists have
been the number one domestic terror threat for over a decade. Whether
they go by the traditional name, Nazis, or dress themselves up as the
“alt-right,” they're a dangerous crew, and as a plot driver, they
have two things I look for: the potential for a LOT of conflict, and
an issue that's plausible for a rural area in upstate New York.
newcomers – and white
supremacists. I follow the news closely, and white supremacists have
been the number one domestic terror threat for over a decade. Whether
they go by the traditional name, Nazis, or dress themselves up as the
“alt-right,” they're a dangerous crew, and as a plot driver, they
have two things I look for: the potential for a LOT of conflict, and
an issue that's plausible for a rural area in upstate New York.
What
I didn't expect was that the issue would be so
timely. Every time I do more online research on the various ways
white supremacists find each other and organize, or on their
malignant beliefs, or on the ways violence against women is
intertwined with “white pride”/Christian dominionism/mens rights
advocacy, I wonder which FBI agent is adding pages to my file.
I
find myself repeatedly running up against two challenges while
working on this book. The first is: how much info do I give about the
ways the alt-right lures disaffected young (mostly) men (mostly)
without creating a road map for someone reading the completed novel?
Just as no mystery writer wants to give the exact
composition and
dose that would enable readers to poison their, ah, loved ones, and
no thriller author wants to tell the audience precisely how to
construct an explosive out of commonly-available materials, I have no
desire to give any potentially curious alt-folks a handy users guide
to finding their local chapter of Nazis-R-Us.
composition and
dose that would enable readers to poison their, ah, loved ones, and
no thriller author wants to tell the audience precisely how to
construct an explosive out of commonly-available materials, I have no
desire to give any potentially curious alt-folks a handy users guide
to finding their local chapter of Nazis-R-Us.
Secondly:
how to I ensure the “bad guys” are authentic, rounded, three
dimensional human beings without apologizing for or glossing over
their vile beliefs? It's a different thing from making sure my
previous villains are recognizably human. A man who sells drugs might
love his kids, and someone who kills to keep his business afloat
might do it out of understandable desperation. But it's hard to
thread that needle when your talking about, you know, Nazis.
Anyhoo.
Here's an excerpt from a little further along in the first
chapter/prologue, this beginning of which you can read here. One of
the men on the White Supremacy float has unveiled a nasty banner,
enraging Ron Tucker, one of the guests at the party. He flings
himself at the offending sheet (and the man displaying it,) Russ
races out to stop the fist fight, and the whole melee, boxed between
floats before and behind, careens down the road at a walking pace.
Clare
turned and faced her conscripts. “Okay, you two. Get up to the cab
and see if you can stabilize that steering wheel.”
Bill
looked at the melee with dismay. “What if the driver tries to hit
us?”
Hit
him back, she didn't say. “Tell
him you're trying to help him.”
“He's
a Nazi!” Terry
protested.
“Then
tell him Russ is trying to help him! Go! Now!” Whipped by her
command voice, they ran toward the tractor. Clare could hear the
whoop-whoop of a squad car signalling pedestrians out of its way, but
she couldn't make out its light bar in the blaze and glitter of the
floats behind her. Should she help Russ? No, another body would just
increase the chance of an accident. Terry and Bill were hanging off
the sides of the tractor now, reaching inside, hopefully, dear God,
about to straighten its trajectory.
In
the middle of the carnival of light and dark and movement, her eye
was caught by one still figure. A woman with a large white candy
bucket had stopped, staring, as her float arced past, riveted in
place by the sight of the men tussling on the back of the tractor.
Maybe, like Clare, she was concerned for her husband.
Clare
ran toward her. The woman, startled, whirled and raised her bucket –
whether an offense or a defense, Clare couldn't tell, but she stopped
short and spread her open hands. “I'm not here to hurt you.” She
gestured up the road, where the siren's sound was more pronounced.
“The police are going to be here very soon. If we can stop this
fight now, nobody needs to get arrested. Is that your husband?”
They both looked at the back of the float. The man in question
managed to shove Ron Tucker out of striking distance, but the
mechanic wound his fists in the sheet and wrenched it away, flinging
it onto the pavement.
“Oh,
no!” the woman said. She lurched toward the fallen banner.
“Leave
it.” Clare grabbed the woman's coat. “The police are going to
confiscate it anyway.”
“They
can't do that! We have a right to be heard! We have a first amendment
right!”
“Look
at me.” Clare pointed to her eyes. “Look at me! You don't have a
first amendment right to brawl, and the cops aren't going to care who
threw the first punch. My husband is trying to stop it.” She
pointed to where Russ clawed at Tucker's jacket. The banner carrier,
now deprived of his prize, was in it with two hands, trading blow for
blow with the mechanic. “We
need to stop it.”
“How?”
Clare
hadn't realized how keyed up she was until she felt a downbeat of
relief at the woman's question. “If your husband jumps off the
float, it'll give mine the chance to grab his assailant.” The woman
looked blank. “The other guy.”
JULIA: I'm sure you've read many other books that deal with difficult issues, dear readers. Can you think of novels or movies where it's been handled especially well? And - not that we're going to name names - can you think of cases where the writer(s) got it wrong?










