Showing posts with label Dandy Gilver. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dandy Gilver. Show all posts

Friday, December 3, 2021

The Comic of Catriona's Heart

HANK PHILLIPPI RYAN:  From the time I was oh, maybe 10, until the time I was maybe 14 (and found the Beatles), there was not a day that went by when my mother didn’t yell at me to “put down that comic book!” I know I read all of the Archie comics and things like Richie Rich and Scrooge McDuck Duck, but I quickly moved to Superman, and Wonder Woman, and Justice League of America. All of those super power heroes--- Supergirl, and Aqualass, and The Flush, and Green Hornet, and the Legion of Superheroes, and whoa, I really wish I still had them.


But that was in Indiana, and little did I know that Catriona McPherson, at the same time of her life but in Scotland, was reading comics, too. But they were ––from the looks of these––very different from the ones I read.

(As I said, I eventually moved onto MAD, then the Beatles magazines, and then Seventeen, and Glamour, and Vogue. So our reading preferences change. And the other day AARP Magazine arrived, but whatever.)

Catriona is always fascinating, but the childhood insights—and the comics she read that she shares with us today--I had never heard before of. Have you? Have you read any of these?

 

The Comic I Loved

By Catriona McPherson

 

The Mirror Dance, Dandy Gilver No. 15, is largely set in Doig’s & Co. the fictional publisher of a women’s magazine – The Rosy Cheek – and its sister paper – The Freckle for girls.


They are what Dandy Gilver calls “strenuously wholesome organs promising thrift without want and entertainment without corruption”.

Neither title ever existed, but the descriptions of the covers and the stories inside wrote themselves, because until I moved to the US, I spent every sojourn in a doctor’s dentist’s and hairdresser’s waiting room, leafing through The Rosy Cheek’s real-life equivalents.


I can’t remember who said this but there’s never been a better summation than “knit your royal family!”. And that was after a childhood steeped in papers and comics exactly as bouncing, cheerful, normative, and unsettling in retrospect as the Freckle anyday.

I lived not far from Dundee and that city was the home of D.C.Thompson, a fount of comics: The Beano – full of anarchic cartoons; The Dandy – an action-packed upstart (it said “Better than The Beano” on some covers), Oor Wullie – a Just William style rascal; and The Broons – a rabblesome family that prefigured the Royles ( not the royals!) or maybe Shameless.

DCT also published and still publish daily, weekly and weekend newspapers, and a slew of magazines. (They’re so ubiquitous that the only way to make it clear that Doig’s wasn’t Thompson’s was to put Thompson’s into the book in a cameo.)












And then there were those comics for girls. They’re probably better now – if I still lived there I’d nip and buy one to check – but in the seventies The Twinkle, The Bunty, The Jackie, and The Shout were roughly: fun with Mummy, japes at school, tears over cute boys, pregnancy scares. I ducked out at the Jackie stage and went to Cosmopolitan. But that was after a lot of years of boarding schools, ballet classes, ice skating accidents, secret diaries and blood feuds.

The comic of my heart was none of these, although I devoured them every week, spent summer pocket money on the Bumper Seaside Special and always found a Christmas Annual in my stocking. No, the comic I loved was the Teddy Bear Weekly. I still remember waiting to hear the letterbox flap on a Saturday afternoon when the paperboy delivered it. Joy until bedtime, guaranteed.

And I was pretty fierce about it as an adult too, because everyone I spoke to was convinced I had imagined it.

Pre-Wikipedia, when I tried to reminisce about a comic whose primary avatar was a teddy bear, I met with blank looks all round.

Out with Mummy?” I’d say. “You mean, Watch with Mother?” would come the reply. “That was on the telly.”

Paddy Paws the Puppy?” I’d try next. “Sounds like Enid Blyton,” they’d respond.

Doctor David and Nurse Susan?” I’d pitch, getting a strain in my voice. “What?” I’d hear. “No way. I mean I know things were conservative but no one would ever …”

Edward and The Jumblies?” I’d offer up. “A little boy called Edward who went to a magical land full of jumblies and befriended the king?” That’s when people would either say “Sounds like  fever dream” or “You mean ‘The Jumblies’ by Edward Lear? Well, there you go. You’ve invented a comic, Catriona, and you probably owe the Lear estate some royalties.”

I was beginning to doubt it myself – gaslighting is highly effective – when my parents cleared out their attic and gave me The Teddy Bear Annual from 1969.














Out with Mummy. Bam!














Paddy Paws the Puppy. Kapow!












Nurse Susan and Doctor David. Re-ordered to appease women’s libbers but definitely there. Booya!














And – drumroll – Edward and the Jumblies. Whoever owes the Lear estate for the use of intellectual property it is not me.












I was so happy to see all these characters again.


Did you read comics when you were a child, Reds? Have you looked at them since you’ve been grown up? There’s nothing quite like it. The taste of a madeleine doesn’t get a look in, if you ask me .


HANK PHILIPPI RYAN: Honestly, Catriona, I am trying to figure these out. I am baffled by these. I remember something called Highlights for Children, which they had in the dentist’s office, and which I loathed. But the nostalgia, I understand.

How about you, Reds and readers, did you read comics as a child?

 


National-bestselling and multi-award-winning author, Catriona McPherson was born in Scotland and lived there until immigrating to the US in 2010.

She writes historical detective stories set in the old country in the 1930s, featuring gently-born lady sleuth, Dandy Gilver. THE MIRROR DANCE is number fifteen. After eight years in the new country, she kicked off the comic Last Ditch Motel series, which takes a wry but affectionate look at California life from the POV of a displaced Scot (where do we get our ideas, eh?). Book 4, SCOT MIST, is coming in January. She also writes a strand of contemporary psychological thrillers.

Catriona is a member of MWA, CWA, Society of Authors, and a proud lifetime member and former national president of Sisters in Crime.  www.catrionamcpherson.com

Saturday, May 18, 2013

JUST SAY NO TO ALL THINGS

DEBORAH CROMBIE: There are days when I love Facebook.
And my writer friends. Yesterday I was skimming, as I hadn't been on Facebook in a few days (more than a few days) and a post by my very talented writer friend Catriona McPherson (author of the Dandy Gilver series, wonderful novels set in Scotland in the 1920s) jumped off the screen and smacked me right in the face. It was a photo of a page from Catriona's diary, reproduced here with her permission.

THIS WEEK NO TO ALL THINGS

This is the sweetest, and the hardest, sentence in the writer's  universe. And meant, I was sure, just for me.

Following the thread, I saw that Cat had posted a link to a blog by someone named Kevin Ashton, titled CREATIVE PEOPLE SAY NO. 

For anyone who engages in any sort of creative work, I'd list this as a MUST READ. Mr. Ashton begins by recounting the story of a Hungarian psychology professor professor who once wrote to famous creators asking them to be interviewed for a book he was writing. A third said NO, they were too busy. Another third didn't answer, probably because they were too busy and didn't have secretaries.

Mr. Ashton goes on to say that time equals creativity, and that any loss of time is a loss of productive work. My favorite of his examples is a quote from Charles Dickens, rejecting an invitation from a friend: "It is only half an hour’ — ‘It is only an afternoon’ — ‘It is only an evening,’ people say to me over and over again; but they don’t know that it is impossible to command one’s self sometimes to any stipulated and set disposal of five minutes — or that the mere consciousness of an engagement will sometime worry a whole day … Who ever is devoted to an art must be content to deliver himself wholly up to it, and to find his recompense in it. I am grieved if you suspect me of not wanting to see you, but I can’t help it; I must go in my way whether or no.” 

I would go so far as to say that loss of time/work due to an inability to say NO has been the biggest hurdle of my writing life, and one certainly not conquered. 

I'm getting out my desk diary now and putting in my page-per-day goals, and filling in any "free" time with THIS WEEK NO TO ALL THINGS. (And thanking Catriona.)

REDS and READERS, is the constant erosion of creative time by little requests and chores a problem for everyone?  If so, how do you deal with it?

 
 

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Starry, Starry Fright



HANK PHILLIPPI RYAN: It's enough to drive you crazy. Admit it, it is.

You know you shouldn't read those Amzaon reviews, except, you know , the good ones are SO good, and it's reassuring and heartwarming to see someone you don't even know have such good taste in talking about your book.

So of course, you read 'em.

Then one day, the little number by your book cover says "40" when the day before it said "39." So you know there's a new review.

And, WAAAIT a minit. Your lovely solid five * thing is now edging closer to 4 *. Huh?

My worst, so far, and I'm so sorry if this is someone reading this blog but whatever, was when one review of one of my books said that the bad guy just showed up in last chapter, and no one had heard of him in the rest of the book. That 's just--gasp, it still makes my stomach clench--not true! I mean, its not true in any way, and the bag guy is there front and center from the beginning. So the person could not COULD NOT have read the book. So WHY put up something like that? Don't get me started.

Too late.


Anyway, the good news is I get to introduce you to Catriona McPherson, who is hilarious, brilliant (truly) and a force of nature (pronounce her first name like the force of nature that hit New Orleans). Her new book is...well, hilarious, brilliant and a force of nature. More on that below. (And if you want to win a free one, keep reading. )


Today Catriona offers a new, kind of glass-half-full way of looking at reviews. You'll never read them the same way again. And that (like Catriona) is a good thing.


One starrrrrrrrr, shining in the darkneeeeeeeesssssss . . .



I know this song. It’s an emetically emotional power ballad. It’s made for So You Think You’ve Got Talent, You Deluded Schmuck. But I can’t remember the title, can’t find it by googling the lyric, so can’t give you a link to a YouTube video. Be grateful.


And besides, I’m not actually blogging about bad songs. I’m blogging about bad reviews. Amazon one stars, you see. This little fella: * Wouldn’t Amazon and the One Stars be a great name for a writers’ rock band? Almost as good as Four Hungry Children for a country and western outfit. (I can’t sing or play an instrument, but I can think up band names all day.)


At Bouchercon 2011 in St Louis this year, Colin Cotteril and I got re-acqauainted after meeting once years ago and bonded over the joys and challenges of *, the topic of the panel Colin dreamed up and moderated, to the entertainment of all.


The joy is straightforward enough. Fiction writers are interested in character and the writer of a * usually reveals a lot more about themselves than about the book they’re reviewing.
The challenge is to chart a path from the universe of the special individual who wrote it back to the world where the rest of us live. Endless fun for Colin Cotteril, for me and maybe for you too.


Okay, first off: let’s not talk about * for books that deserve no more. In any merit system, the best books belong at one end and the worst at the other. No one can dispute that. And *s that start with “I’ve been waiting five weeks and my book hasn’t arrived” are just too sad to contemplate for long. Also, only a churl would take a pop at those poor, beleaguered high-school students being made to write reviews of books their teachers chose. Reading a book is one thing; doing a book isn’t.



No, I want to talk to you about the others; the delicious, moon-howlingly mad *, the *that makes you glad this reviewer doesn’t have a small country to run, the * that makes you hope this reviewer has a curfew or even an ankle-band.


There are some simple algorithms to deal with the most common egregious *s.


1: * from anyone who doesnt know how to use apostrophe’s = three stars.


2: * from anyone who thinks “loser” has two “o”s = four stars


3: * from anyone who thinks “boring” has five “o”s = five stars


And so, just as you can convince yourself that you have a diet so healthy that you make Michael Pollan look like Homer Simpson – because food you eat in the car, in other people’s houses, or standing up in front of the fridge doesn’t count – you can convince yourself that you have never actually had a legitimate *. Or I can anyway.

If you read enough of these things, you start to see other patterns too, more subtle patterns, but they’re there.



There are the Petulant Huffs. They can be paraphrased as: “I ordered a unit of stock from this writer and it was not exactly what I was expecting. This is an outrage. Get back to your computer and read my mind with a bit more attention next time, you provider of inadequate service, you!”


I get that a tube of Pringles should be a tube of Pringles and if you crack one open to find the best peanut brittle of your life you might still be miffed. But novels aren’t extruded product. A * Petulant Huff is a four star to me.



Another favourite type are the Cynical Drawls. They go like this: “McPherson (for instance) is copying a better writer/ Grafton had a deadline looming and phoned it in/Evanovich is tired of the series and can’t be bothered any more/Rowling has made her millions and couldn’t care less now. “



I’ve never met a writer who wasn’t in it up to her (or his) neck, deeply involved with her characters, acutely aware that every time you publish a novel you’re cracking open your ribcage, pinning back the flesh of your chest and letting the world see, and judge, your beating heart.
So a * Cynical Drawl is a four star from where I’m looking.


And then there are the one-offs. The randomly hilarious reviews. They light up my day so brightly, I’d rather have them with their bonkers * than a saner five-star any day.

Especially delectable is when you hit a patch of them around one innocent little book. The world’s more fun for knowing that someone reviewed How to Make an American Quilt and complained, apparently without irony, that it seemed fragmented. “Fragmented.” “Quilt.” She read over her review, saw these two words close together in the same sentence and . . . nope, nothing.

And when I went looking for this review again (it’s an old favourite) I found another * of the same book that was even better. And I quote:


“This Book is horrible! If you're thinking of buying it, don't. There's hardly anything in it about Finn, the main character.Plus it has instructions on how to make a quilt! How stupid is that! If I wanted to know how to make a quilt I would buy a book about quilting, not a book about a movie.”

“ A book about a movie.” I’m happy to be alive.



Now, for budding * fans, a couple of pointers about how to find the juicy ones.



Stephen King is one of my favourite writers. His fan-base has, at its far opposite edges, Group A. devotees of his earlier, horribler novels (I think of these readers (unfairly) as Comic Book Guy) who loathe his later, messier stuff and Group B. readers who love his characters and his towns and his big, warm heart and think he’s getting better and better (and kind of wish he’d do one without any BOO!, just to see what happens).





So Comic Book Guy is giving King a lot of * these days. Here’s a good one of Lisey’s Story, with a smidge of Petulant Huff and a pinch of Cynical Drawl too.




“As a trucker I rent a lot of books and generally grab up any Stephen King reads because his books really help me chew up the miles on long hauls. Like others have said...I too couldn't finish it. In fact after renting it for around $12 (Unabridged) I turned it back in after only getting part way through disk 4 of about a 12 disk set. . . . Some like romance novels, but when I pick up Stephen King I expect to be entertained. This book up to disk 4 was just a rambling mush fest. This has such a strong female flavor of romance to it that I can't help wonder if it wasn't Stephen King's wife who wrote it, and they slapped his name on it for marketing.”





I can’t remember how many times I’ve written a book and given to my husband to put out under his name, can you? Well, it’s the wifely thing to do.
Or you can go straight to the top.



Pride and Prejudice has 55 *s on Amazon.com as I write. Half of them are complaining about the price, the quality of the CDs, the kindle edit or, in one case, the paper quality. And some of them are from poor high school kids being tortured by their teachers. But others are gems indeed.


Take this one:


“I am so disappointed. Being a fan of classic literature I was looking forward to reading Pride & Prejudice. But what I got was moderately-well written chick lit. Think of Pride and Prejudice as the Bridgit Jones of the 18th Century.”



And while you’re at it, think of Romeo and Juliet as the West-Side Story of Renaissance Verona.



Think of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde as the Nutty Professor of Victorian London. Think of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein as the older brother of The Young Frankenstein, and pause to wonder why she wrote a book about a movie.




HANK: Ah, I can't type. I am still laughing. Let's just say..we'll give a copy of Catriona's new book to one lucky commenter--and come on, who doesn't want to comment about reviews?





Catriona McPherson is a recovering academic and the author of six novels set in Scotland in the 1920s, featuring the gently-born but nevertheless pretty kick-ass private detective, Dandy Gilver. (Hank says: It's kind of Upstairs, Downstairs meets Nora Charles.)





St Martin's Press have just launched the series in the US with The Proper Treatment of Bloodstains. A year ago, Catriona left a ramshackle farm in a beautiful valley in southern Scotland, and now lives on a ramshackle farm in a beautiful valley in northern California. Cantaloupe instead of rutabaga - otherwise business as usual.











Check out my website https://webmail.whdh.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=a865385c47014701bcdaa604685d895a&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dandygilver.com.%2f.
Read my weekly blog sitting typing alone in a room.
Find me on Facebook.
Follow me on Twitter @CatrionaMcP.
In fact, good luck trying to avoid me.