Saturday, May 9, 2026

When Real LIfe Meets Research



HANK PHILLIPPI RYAN: Oh, gosh. What a thought-provoking post today from author Lynne Squires. I wonder how many of us have stories like this..but that’s not the question she has for us at the end of this touching essay.

See what happens when one discovery in a her life--developed not only into a novel, but into understanding and compassion.


When Real Life Meets Research


By M. Lynne Squires

After my mother’s passing when I was in my 30s, I found out she had been committed to an asylum for depression when I was just a year or two old. Mental health issues were treated differently then. What would be addressed today with medication and therapy, in the 1950s still subject to more arcane methods, from “fresh air cures” to lobotomies.

I was able to request the records for her stay there. There were meager notes about her time there, but enough to know she received shock treatments before her release.

Now in my 60s, I began a story about a new mother with auditory hallucinations and depression, inspired by my mother’s experience.

When I started writing fiction, it never occurred to me the research that would be involved. I thought research was the denizen of the nonfiction author. That misconception was debased early in my make-believe world creation journey. In the past few years, I have found myself down rabbit holes about the history of safety deposit boxes, how cross-stitch samplers came about, and more recently, the origin of the phrase “above the fold” in reference to newspaper articles.

















I often find research for historical fiction is best accomplished in viewing old photographs and postcards. The nuances the eye can observe are often the details a narrative might overlook. A recent deep dive centered around asylums from the 1950s and backwards through the 17th century. Photographs and postcards are plentiful, although I wonder who would be excited to receive a postcard featuring an insane asylum?

An actual visit to a long defunct asylum a few hours from my home was enlightening and disturbing in equal measure. Designed in such a way to promote good air flow through cross ventilation, I imagine when the number of patients swelled from the intended capacity of 240 exceeded 2,400, the air quality suffered.

My main interest was in researching reasons for commitment to an asylum. In the earliest days, they ranged from “reading” and “asthma” to “laziness” and “vicious vices.” Often courts approved commitment of individuals for assessment and treatment, leaving them for lengths of stay dependent on the whim of the facilities administration or medical staff. Families could drop off a child, spouse, or other relative at an asylum door and many times never return for them.


The setting for my book, River of Silence, is such an asylum in the 1950s. When finding photos of nurses in the 1950s, I could practically hear the squeak of nurses polished white leather shoes against black and white tile floors and feel the white uniforms stiff with starch. Legs were always encased in opaque white stockings and white caps topped each head.

In that era, patients diagnosed with depression and anxiety were usually given electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Lobotomies were performed far more frequently than one might imagine. On a typical day, dozens might be administered one after another, without the benefit of any anesthesia. Pictures of the equipment used were horrifying. The lobotomy tools were the equivalent of a basic ice pick and hammer.

My protagonist, Anastasia, committed to an asylum against her will learns the horror of being there, the helplessness of staying there, and the battle of trying to escape. Her story is told through the connected experiences of various people. Her family, friends, hospital staff, and other patient’s narratives come together to illuminate the picture of how mental health was dealt with over a half century ago. To tell Anastasia’s story through her eyes alone would not encompass the depth of her experience.

In telling this story, I realized the value of seeing how each character’s narrative enriched the story by weaving in details of setting and experiences outside the main character’s view. I wanted, in essence, a novel told in short stories where different elements were given space to expand and contribute to the overall story arc.

And FYI, possibly my favorite character is Agnes, a feisty, thin-as-a-rail patient, whose constant disheveled appearance belies her razor-sharp wit. If you must be in a new unfamiliar situation, you’d want an Agnes in your corner.


So Readers, at my age, writing about the 1950s hardly seems to be historical fiction, yet here we are. Stories set in what era do you most enjoy reading?



HANK: I agree–how can the fifties be historical fiction? Or the sixties? Yikes. What do you think Reds and Readers?




River of Silence
is a story about a woman, Anastasia, taken away from her husband and infant daughter and committed to an asylum in the 1950s. Her story is told from multiple perspectives: the patients, her physicians, nurses, an orderly, an aide, and fellow patients. Within their stories is woven the world in which Anastasia finds herself. She undergoes electric shock treatments so common at that time. Her struggle to return home is difficult, punctuated with cruelty, misunderstanding, and despair.

She becomes friends with two women far different from her friends in her life at home. With nothing in common, the three make tenuous steps toward forging a relationship. A sane act in their uncertain world, the three come to care for, support, and defend each other.

The mental health world in the 1950s was in transition with antipsychotics being a newly introduced treatment for mental disorders. Some doctors embraced change, and some eschewed it. Anastasia struggles with the fear of falling prey to her old-school physician who believed lobotomies were a fallback cure for any patient he deemed difficult or incurable. He seems to dislike her, accusing her of not talking or interacting, and she fears the worst. A young physician fights for the patient's right to utilize new treatments. He's aware of the high mortality rate with lobotomies.

Anastasia starts teaching the women on her ward to crochet, and through that, she becomes engaged with staff and patients to the doctor's begrudging satisfaction.

The present-day last chapter has Anastasia's daughter preparing to sell her mother's home. She ruminates with her friend about her mother's journey and her eventual return home.



M. Lynne Squires, an Urban Appalachian Author, writes fiction, essays, and dabbles in poetry. Her first novel, River of Silence is forthcoming in May. She has penned four books, and her work has appeared in numerous journals, such as Change Seven and The Ekphrastic Review, and multiple anthologies, including the Anthology of Appalachian Writers, and Fearless: Women's Journeys to Self-Empowerment. She is a Pushcart Prize nominee and is the 2020 Pearl S. Buck Writing for Social Change Award recipient. She writes at her home in Appalachia beside her furry overlords, Scout and Boo Radley.


RIVER OF SILENCE (currently in pre-order) is available at mountainstatepress.org. The release date is May 31st.

Friday, May 8, 2026

Welcome to CatrionaLand (All are welcome!)


HANK PHILLIPPI RYAN: Hurray and hurray—we love Catriona day! She is incredibly talented, and incredibly wonderful, and we are always so delighted when she visits—especially with a new book. The brand new one is intriguingly titled The Dead Room. Can you guess why? I bet it is not what you think.) (And I have devoured it, and it is terrific.)

Anyway. Today, delightfully, she takes us on a very special journey. To CatrionaLand!

(And some very special info for you at the end!)

Blurred Lines


By Catriona McPherson

I quite often, when I’m writing a book, start with an interesting bit of reality and run. When I was beginning The Child Garden, finding out about rocking sones and devil’s bridges was utter catnip.




Rocking stones are neolithic, egg-shaped stones – some enormous – that sit in stone cups and, if shoved, rock. Now, as you can imagine if you consider how long ago neolithis (?) was, hardly any of them survive to . . . I tried hard not to say “rock on” here. I failed . . . because people get too enthusiastic and shove too hard. Then the stones tumble off down hills and break in riverbeds.

That much is true.

Devil’s bridges have nothing to do with rocking stones. They’re just bridges that happen to be in Scotland or Ireland and so, through no fault of their own, have gathered stories about how the devil and his minions can’t cross them, like a sheep gather burrs. The stories go on that the devil then lurks on one side or the other asking for soul swaps. 

Two thoughts occur: one – these old bridges are not that big and the rivers underneath are usually no more than rocky streams so why doesn’t he just get his cloven hooves wet and paddle across?; two – wouldn’t it help to know which side?

That much is also “true”. That is, I didn’t make these tales up. “Tam O’Shanter” is related and the devil has become an ordinary goat in some retellings.

But, at some point downstream, I put the stories of the stones and bridges together and I think I came up with a piece of folklore that rocking stones are found near devil’s bridges, and have devils trapped inside them. They have to be rocked every day – thirteen times, naturally – to keep him addled so he can’t escape. This now feels as real to me as leprechauns’ gold and Santa’s love of a chimney. And I’m not that great a note-keeper so I’m not entirely clear on where exactly I started making stuff up and what might be rooted in Celtic lore.

The same thing happened with the lowping stane (leaping stone) in The Witching Hour. It’s real. See pic. It’s outside the old school in the village of Dirleton. And I know for a fact that schoolchildren used to leap over it on the last day of school in the summertime, because it says so on the tourist information board in the old phone box with the wee free library.



In my book, what happens is the children are the only ones who still leap over it – with stinging nettles strewn on the top for extra peril – but it used to be the case that everyone in the village did so, right before harvest-time. The pure of heart would clear it. Witches and other evil-doers, though, would fail, stumble and hurt themselves. Thus the village could be sure that, when they all went out to bring in the crops, there would be no one whose wickedness would cause blight and famine.

Jungle Red Readers, I have no clue where the join is between the truth and Catrionaland in the middle of that. (And I’m writing this on a plane, en route to Malice, where I didn’t download the app before take-off so I can’t check.)

All of that is by way of excusing what’s just happened in The Dead Room. I used a real town, in a real county, in a real country, as the setting for the story. When I was done, I scrupulously (Ha!) laid out in the author’s note that Menstrie, Clackmannanshire, Scotland was real but that the property centre, the nursing home, the pub, the garden centre and the Lord family’s scrapyard business (Lord’s Will Provide!) were imaginary. I claimed that Sir Andy Murray’s gold postbox in Dunblane was the only actual location in the entire novel.



Then I sent out ARCs. And one early reader (with a story of his own (which I told for Kristopher Zgorski at BOLO Books on account of the musical theatre angle)) came back with an “Ummmmmm, Catriona? The scrapyard? Ehhhhhh, have you ever been to Sam Burns’ Yard in East Lothian? Because the similarity is uncanny.”

Yeek! I never miss a trip to Sam Burns’ Yard when I’m in Scotland. Of course it was there that I saw faded glass and china out in the elements filling with leaves and dust as the seasons passed. It was there I found out that hotel overstock mattresses are wrapped in plastic with the prices Sharpied on, and that the further back you go the more likely you are to find the skeletons of bikes and barrows poking up through long grass.

Of course Sam Burns’ Yard is better organised and doesn’t degenerate into the kind of outsize trail mix of dolls’ heads and door hinges you’ll find in Lord’s, no matter how far towards the back fence you meander. Still though. It’s the place I found the trove of mid-century bookclub hardbacks from the collection of one “T. Jolly”, as per the flyleafs, that wound up being central to the plot in Quiet Neighbors. It’s been very good to me and it deserved a mention.


Next time, I am going to keep scrupulous notes as I go along.

(Narrator from the future: she didn’t.)

HANK: Reds and readers, I cannot tell you what The Dead Room means. You will just have to read the book and find out. But let’s ask: which of the places Catriona mentions would you like to visit? And why? 

(And—pssst. THE DEAD ROOM (now the NUMBER ONE new release in psychological fiction on Amazon) is now a Kindle Unlimited! Which means, whoo hoo, if you are a Prime member, you can get it FREE!)




Catriona McPherson (she/her) was born in Scotland and immigrated to the US in 2010. A former linguistics professor, she is now a full-time fiction writer and has published: preposterous 1930s private-detective stories; realistic 1940s amateur-sleuth stories (
The Edinburgh Murders is latest); and contemporary psychothriller standalones (The Dead Room is the brand-new one). These are all set in Scotland with a lot of Scottish weather. She also writes modern comic crime capers about a Scot-out-of-water in a “fictional” college town in Northern California sneezedavissneeze. Scot’s Eggs, No. 8 just won for best humorous novel at Left Coast Crime in San Francisco. Her other novels have won Agathas, Anthonys, Leftys and Macavitys and been finalists for an Edgar, a CWA Dagger and three Mary Higgins Clark awards.

Catriona is a proud lifetime member and former national president of Sisters in Crime.





In this atmospheric thriller from Catriona McPherson, a young widow seeking refuge from her grief wades into the mists at the far end of memory lane—where something even darker awaits.

 

Reeling from the death of her husband, thirtysomething audiobook narrator Lindsay Hale retreats to her Scottish hometown and the comforts of old times. Her family rallies, her old friends offer support, but something is wrong . . . something beyond grief. Something she can only glimpse from the corner of her eye.

A new house should help, but why is she recognising strangers, forgetting familiar faces?

Every night, as Lindsay’s dream house fills with nightmares, she wonders whether she’s truly unravelling—or if something more sinister is at play. Buried secrets surface and reality bends, forcing Lindsay to face the terrifying truth that her hard-won haven isn’t so safe after all.









Thursday, May 7, 2026

Do We Live in Parallel Universes? (Just A Thought.)

 HANK PHILLIPPI RYAN: Have you ever wished for a do-over? To go back two steps or two hours or two days? Grab your tea or coffee and spend a few minutes today with the very thought-provoking  Lori Gold. And see if your outlook on life gets changed a bit.




Is Any of This

Even Real?!

 

by Lori Gold

 

Apparently the answer to that is no. Or no-ish?

 

Recently, scientific articles originally published a couple of years ago have been popping up in my Instagram feed. (Side note: The adage of “be careful what you wish for” is being replaced by “be careful what you click on once.”)

 

The posts are from places like WIRED and people like Neil deGrasse Tyson, not unfamiliar sources, which I think makes what I’m about to say scarier? Because in each of them, there’s an argument being made that we’re living in a computer simulation. That none of this, everything around us, even us, is “real,” or at least what we consider “real.” The idea is apparently based on quantum theories and physics and all sorts of things we, as writers, pretend don’t exist because we live in a world of stories.

 

Wait a second…we live in a world of stories. To us, to writers and to many readers, our worlds are “real.” But they aren’t, objectively, right? That’s not the same as what these articles are proposing. They’re saying, and I’m talking 50-50 chance, that this is all some sort of elaborate video game (I’m paraphrasing). Like The Matrix (I’m assuming). That this universe and the lives we have were made up by something else, in this case, some super-duper-powerful computer (not a technical term). What if it’s true? Does that change the way we live? Should it?

 

This type of philosophical thinking has always interested me (more explanation for what pops up in my social media feed!). As a form of entertainment, grounded speculative is one of the genres I love, from TV shows like Lost to movies like Palm Springs, to books like This Time Tomorrow by Emma Straub, The Midnight Library by Matt Haig, One Italian Summer by Rebecca Serle, Maybe Next Time by Cesca Major, and the list goes on.

 

Each one tackles some form of speculative element, be it time travel, a time loop like Groundhog Day, or parallel universes. And like the notion of living in a simulation, these are backed by scientific theory.

 


While writing my latest novel, a grounded speculative, I did a lot of research into quantum physics. My novel centers on three women who each make a choice while playing the conversation game, kiss, marry, kill and wind up in an alternate universe where they have to live out the choices they made—and their consequences. This led me down the rabbit hole of the multiverse and many-worlds interpretation. The theory goes (and remember, I write fiction, so grain of salt!) that every time a decision is made, the outcome not taken branches off into a different reality. Every time. That means the universe has split and is still splitting into near-infinite alternatives.

 

Theoretically, then, we have lived and are living every version of our life. I became obsessed with what that means for us on a very personal level, especially, the pressure we all put on ourselves every day to make the “right” choice. As if this job or that partner or that cute, tassely-throw pillow from Target will solve our every problem.


If we get to live every version of our life, what does that do to this idea of making the “perfect” choice? What does it do for you personally and the way you make decisions? Would you want to get the chance to live another version of your life? What would you hope to be? Who would you hope is there with you?

 

Ultimately, I think that’s what these scientific theories that show up in my feed and these stories we writers build from them do: they make us think about who we are, who we hoped to be, and hopefully encourage us to close the gap.


HANK: I am living this particularly right now, and it leads me to wonder whether–and I’m not talking about the moral ethical “right” decision, but a physical choice of A thing or B thing, either of which could be fine but there’s no way to know.  And there’s no way to know, because that would mean we could predict each and every thing that would come after the decision, which is impossible.


(And I adore speculative fiction. WRONG PLACE WRONG TIME is one of the best books I've ever read.)


What do you think, Reds and Readers?Would you want to get the chance to live another version of your life? What would you hope to be? Who would you hope is there with you?


And Lori, congratulations on the new book!


 

 

 


About the Author

Lori Gold is the author of KISS, MARRY, KILL (Harper/Park Row, April 7, 2026) and the NPR Book of the Day and Zibby Media Summer Read pick ROMANTIC FRICTION (Harper/MIRA 2025). She is also the author of an adult historical and four novels for young adults (all under Lori Goldstein). She currently lives outside of Boston, where she fosters a writing community through her creative writing classes, book coaching, and writing retreats. She can be found on Instagram (@lorigoldsteinbooks;) and at http://www.lorigoldsteinbooks.com.

 


Kiss, Marry, Kill

 

Which would you choose: kiss, marry, or kill?

 

When three best friends and founders of a health and wellness app on the verge of hitting the big time play a spin on the game of “kiss, marry, kill” at their company’s summer outing, they wake up the next morning in an alternate universe to discover they’ve each done just that.

 

Kiss: In the “real world,” quiet, indecisive Aubrey is heartbroken over things ending with her fiancé. In the new reality ushered in by the game, Aubrey finds herself in bed, naked, next to their company’s newly hired graphic designer.

 

Marry: Practical, straight-laced Ilena, on the brink of a divorce following a stressful struggle with infertility, wakes up six months pregnant and married to their company’s general counsel.

 

Kill: Mallory’s philosophy is to ask neither forgiveness nor permission. Yet the reckless behavior of their biggest investor crosses lines even Mallory didn’t know she had. Especially since she’s been secretly sleeping with him for the past year. She’s mad enough to kill. But in this world, he’s already dead.

 

Told alternately from the perspectives of these three best friends, this Sliding Doors-esque story explores the nuances of ambition, the power of female friendship, and the many facets of love in our lives, ultimately asking: Do our choices define us, or do we define our choices?

 

 

IF YOU WANT TO Link to the books mentioned, here they are:

 

This Time Tomorrow

https://bookshop.org/p/books/this-time-tomorrow-a-novel-emma-straub/ee3bf3286f1a5f8a?ean=9780525539018&next=t

 

Midnight Library https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-midnight-library-a-gma-book-club-pick-a-novel-matt-haig/0e23137cd6964727?ean=9780525559498&next=t

 

One Italian Summer https://bookshop.org/p/books/one-italian-summer-a-novel-rebecca-serle/69509ba44a56aa62?ean=9781982166809&next=t

 

Maybe Next Time https://bookshop.org/p/books/maybe-next-time-a-reese-witherspoon-book-club-pick-cesca-major/5c485651b2067904?ean=9780063239975&next=t