JULIA SPENCER-FLEMING: All genre lovers have had the moment. That moment. For me, it was when I was a guest at a Vermont literary festival. There was a reception the first evening for the presenters, and in cocktail party style, people were sharing what they worked at. Novel. Narrative nonfiction. Poet. Then it was my turn. "I write mysteries."
Readers, you would have thought I said I skin kittens. I didn't talk to a single other author the rest of the night.
There's not a great deal of critical respect out there for crime fiction. Science fiction and fantasy are even more suspect, and Romance? Fuggedaboutit! Elizabeth Held wants us to rethink this. You may know her from her her recommendation newsletter WHAT TO READ IF, One of Book Riots Best Book Newsletter (subscribe; it's free and you'll love it!) She got a little frustrated about the lack of thoughtful literary analysis around her favorite genre, and decided to take that on by starting a limited run Substack newsletter inviting some very smart people to write about aspects of books they adore. And who better to dig into than the most beloved, the most thoughtful, the most literary crime fiction author working today - Louise Penny? She's here today to tell us all about her new project, NOTES FROM THREE PINES.
At first glance Louise Penny’s Inspector Gamache books would
seem like prime subjects for academic study. They’re wildly popular
bestsellers, critically beloved and offer keen insights into how our world
considers thorny topics related to religion, politics, crime, addiction and
more.
And yet, a search on JSTOR, a digital library of academic journals, shows just a handful of articles examining Penny’s work.
Unfortunately, this has been the plight of the mystery writer since the days of Agatha Christy. As scholar Marty S. Knepper notes in her essay, “Contemporary Cozy Mysteries, Agatha Christie and the 1990s,” “Despite or perhaps because of her sales, Agatha Christie’s reputation during her lifetime suffered at the hands of journalists, scholars, and even mystery historians who frequently criticized her characterization, style, and literary worth.”
Christie never earned the respect she deserved in her day, with detractors calling her books artificial, banal and superficial. The same criticism is hurled at mystery fiction today, more than 100 years after her first book was published.
While mysteries might get more due than they did in Christie’s day, Knepper’s essay was included in a 2021 book that was the first to examine the cozy mystery — a wildly popular subgenre — from an academic perspective. And, yet, it’s clear to anyone who reads crime fiction — mysteries, noir or thrillers — that they have literary worth and should be treated as such.
Penny herself made a similar argument earlier this year at Malice Domestic, the annual convention of mystery writers and fans, while on a panel featuring the authors nominated for the 2022 Agatha Award for Best Contemporary Novel.
The moderator asked the authors if they ever felt constrained by expectations of their genre. Penny responded, “I am very proud to write crime fiction and stand up and wave the flag… but at the same time, I’m tired of this dismissiveness around the genre. Good storytelling is good storytelling, whether you like it or not.”
From my spot on the floor in the back of the room, I began to cheer. I devour genre fiction — romance and mysteries in particular — and am always surprised by the sort of flippant attitude some people have towards it.
One of my biggest pet peeves is the claim that genre fiction is somehow lesser because it’s formulaic, but to me that’s proof of an author’s skill. Making a story that’s been told hundreds of times — a murder mystery or a love story — feel fresh and new is a real skill that should be recognized and celebrated. As Penny said, good storytelling is good storytelling.
More broadly though, readers and scholars who skip mysteries because they don’t think they’re meaty or worth discussing are both wrong and missing out on some really excellent books. From where I’m sitting, some of the sharpest commentary from the literary world on topics ranging from race and religion to tech’s effect on our world are coming from crime writers. See works by Kellye Garrett, David Heska WanbliWeiden, Jane Pek and Julia Spencer-Fleming for proof.
To challenge the outdated notion that mysteries can’t — or shouldn’t be — the subject of careful criticism and examination, a friend and I are launching Notes From Three Pines, a short-run essay collection celebrating and exploring all things Louise Penny and Inspector Gamache.
Notes From Three Pines is a cross between an essay anthology and fan zine. Our contributors are writing about everything from the joy of listening to the audiobooks to the role art plays in the series to the unique character that is Ruth Zardo. (I’m hoping that last one will include an extended meditation on Rosa the duck.)
We have two main goals with this project. First, we want to give fans like us a place to meet and discuss Penny’s books (if that sounds like you, I hope you’ll join us by subscribing). And, second, we want to apply the same sort of lens to the series it would have received if the books weren’t mysteries. As anyone who has read the Inspector Gamache books can attest, these are meaty novels, well worth discussion and analysis.
What about you? Are there books or series you think are unnecessarily dismissed?












