JULIA SPENCER-FLEMING: Liz Milliron is a well-loved member of the Jungle Reds community, and we're always delighted to able to spotlight one of her mysteries. Today, she's back with THE TRUTH WE HIDE, the fourth book in her Homefront Mysteries series, and Liz, I promise I won't make any jokes about Buffalo. After all, in the early '40s it was a vital defense industry and shipping location, and Liz was brilliant to use it as the background for her feisty heroine's investigations into sabotage, class conflict and corruption.
Along with music, clothing, slang and technology, the historical fiction writer has to deal with some of the less-savory aspects of by-gone eras. Even in my youth (which doesn't feel all that by-gone!) we used words and held attitudes I shudder to think of now. How does an author thread that needle? Liz is here to tell us. And for one lucky commenter? A free copy of THE TRUTH WE HIDE!
Thanks Julia and all the Reds for welcoming me back. It’s
always such fun to be in front of the curtain.
Words have power. As writers, we know this. We spend a lot of time searching for just the right word to convey exactly what we mean. Sometimes I think a thesaurus is a writer’s best friend – at least her second-best one. No weak verbs or “almost-but-not-quite-right” words need apply.
But what happens when the word you want isn’t, well, nice?
I’m not talking about mere profanity. Most of us have that
one sorted. Sometimes the boundaries are set by your sub-genre expectations. No
character is going to trot out the “F” word in a cozy. In other cases, it might
be the preference of the author. In my historical Homefront Mysteries series,
I’ve chosen not to use profanity. Not because it didn’t exist in the 1940s, and
not because I’m writing a historical cozy, but because it doesn’t fit the atmosphere
I want to create. Betty, good Catholic girl that she is, wouldn’t swear. At
least not where her mother could hear her.
No, what I’m talking about are those words that people use, or maybe used to use, that we know are simply not acceptable.
In my latest Homefront book, The Truth We Hide, I
deal with the homophobia that existed in the 40s. Part of that is the words
straight people used to describe members of the LGBT+ community. I’m not going
to write them here because this is a family-friendly blog. We all know the words
I’m talking about and we’d never use them.
But people in the 40s did. Frequently. Even casually. There was my conundrum. Did I want Betty to?
On one hand, I want her to be a product of her time. She’s a young Catholic girl growing up when homosexuality was very much not acceptable. On the other hand, I want my readers to like Betty. If she’s casually spewing slurs, is that possible?
To help me out, I turned to friends Edwin Hill and John
Copenhaver (if you haven’t read their books, stop reading this blog now and go
order them). Both were fabulously supportive. Not only did they support my
decision to write the book in the first place, John provided a wealth of
research sources for learning about LGBT culture of the times. One of the
things he addressed was language. “All the slurs you can think of were used,”
he said (I’m paraphrasing).
I made my decision. I wouldn’t shy away from bad language. But I’d use it sparingly and wisely. Betty doesn’t at all. Only one character is a raging homophobe – but he’s a murder suspect. I felt good about it — until my editor asked me if I was sure. People would be upset with me. Did I really want to go there?
I went back to Edwin and John. I explained how I’d handled it. Had I crossed the line?
Once again, they proved the crime fiction community is
generous to a fault. Both praised my decision and said (again I’m
paraphrasing), “Roll with it.” People were, and continue to be, ugly. Even
“good” people use bad language out of ignorance. It’s important to remember the
ugliness of the past – and that such ugliness still exists.
I asked both Edwin and John for blurbs. I was ecstatic at their overwhelmingly positive responses. Mission accomplished.
As a historical writer, I’ve been asked a couple of times what my best tip is. It’s this: Respect your chosen time period. There are lots of good aspects, but there are bad ones, too. Don’t ignore the negative. Deal with it – but in a way that modern audiences will see as respectful. Don’t shy away from the ugly because it’s important to know where we started, how far we’ve come, and how very far we still have to go.
Readers, how do you feel when an author uses facts or language of a time period that is no longer acceptable?
May 1943. Betty Ahern is studying
for her private investigator’s license when a new client—Edward Kettle—hires
her to clear his name after he was dismissed from his job at the American
Shipbuilding Company. When Edward is brutally murdered, the dead man’s sister
hires Betty to finish the original job and find the killer.
The job hurls Betty back into the world of wartime espionage, but with a twist: Edward Kettle was a homosexual. Did he know something about underhanded activities at American Shipbuilding? Or was his secret life the motive for murder?
Once again, Betty must unravel the mystery, which requires uncovering truths that others would prefer to keep hidden—a job that threatens not only her morals and beliefs, but also her life.
Liz Milliron is the author of The Laurel Highlands Mysteries and The Homefront Mysteries, set in Buffalo NY during the early years of World War II. You can can learn more about her mysteries on her website, and you can friend her on Facebook, trade book recommendations on Goodreads, and follow her on Twitter as @LizMilliron. You can also get a free first chapter by signing up for her newsletter.