Sunday, April 16, 2023

If I’m not a writer, who am I?

HANK PHILLIPPI RYAN: One of the things I love the very most about Jungle Red is really two things:  Being able to introduce you to an author you may not have heard of, and  bringing back someone you adore as much as I do. 



Do you know Charles Salzberg? He is absolutely brilliant, and completely charming, and I’m not sure how to say this, but a genuinely devoted citizen of book world. As an author, and as a teacher, and as a human being, he is incredibly special. 


His brand new book, MAN ON THE RUN is out Tuesday, hurray! And it has even Lee Child raving: calling it “smart, sly, and compelling, the very definition of intelligent suspense.”


(I’m not sure about the sly part, but the rest of that endorsement could apply to Charles himself.)


And psssst. One of his writing students you may well have heard of.  Read this interview to find out! 



As you are hearing, I could go on. But now, get your Sunday coffee and read this.  I’ll let Charles do– most of –the talking.  (And not right now, but afterward, go to his website. It is HILARIOUS. Look at it carefully, and have patience.)


HANK: Let’s talk about you, and about writing, and about your writing, and about other people’s writing! And, of course, your brand new wonderful book.  First, you. Have you always wanted to be a writer? Do you remember how that evolved?


CHARLES: Yes, pretty much as far back as I can remember. I was a shy kid who, like so many other shy kids, found refuge in books. On the ground floor of the apartment building where I grew up was a Rexall drugstore and besides having an actual soda fountain, they had racks of paperback books. Almost every day after school, I treated those racks like my own personal library and I was most likely to spend my allowance on a paperback book as anything else.


I was a big fan of the Hardy Boys mysteries, as well as the Landmark series of books, like The Pirate Lafitte and the Battle of New Orleans, or the one about Sam Houston. I think I probably figured the next best thing to reading a book was writing one. And in Junior High School, in order to skip eighth grade, you had to take a typing class, which opened up a whole new world to me. I started writing my first novel when I was about 12, the same time I mastered touch typing (best, most useful class I ever took). When I moved several years ago, I found those three or four single-spaced pages, the beginning of a roman a clef novel about a sleepaway camp.


HANK: When you were a kid, were their books that were formative? Did you know it then, or did you find out later?


CHARLES: At first, it was books like the ones I mentioned above—and especially a book called The Winning Forward Pass, about a college football player—I actually found a copy of that book and it sits on my bookshelf today. As I got older ,I discovered books on those racks like J.D. Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye, Saul Bellow’s Seize the Day, and Bernard Malamud’s The Assistant. That cinched it for me, those worlds were slightly familiar to me and it somehow gave me license to create a made-up world of my own.


HANK: You teach writing, too, and more about that in a minute. But as you’re writing, do you hear yourself teaching? Or are those two separate things?


CHARLES: Interesting question, and it’s one I’ve never approached in that way. They’re definitely connected, but not consciously. One reason might have to do with the way I teach and that is, I don’t try to get folks to write like me. I want to help them find their voice and style. So, I’m never thinking: How would I write this? I’m thinking: How can I help this student do a better job writing what and how they want to write. I do think I’m a better writer because of teaching and the reason is it makes me consider the craft every time I read one of my students’ submissions.


I have to think about what works and what doesn’t work and why it works or doesn’t work. And when I do, I’m pretty sure I unconsciously think about my own work, how I can make it better. But I can say this for sure: I learn from my students all the time (and as much as it pains me to say it, many of them are probably better writers than I am.)



HANK:
Your main character, who continues his adventures in Man on the Run, is Francis Hoyt. You know I absolutely adore him. Where did he come from in your mind? (Lee Child calls Francis Hoyt “a fascinating main character” —what do you think about that?) 


CHARLES: I wish I could answer that, because I have no idea where all my characters come from. Obviously, they’re tucked way back somewhere in my mind, just waiting for the right time to break loose. I can tell you a little about Hoyt’s origins. I’ve always been rather critical of what I think might be a uniquely American problem (at least I consider it a problem): Our obsession with winning, often at any cost. 


Everything becomes a competition and in order to win, and winning is the point. We have to be the best. Think about legendary coach Vince Lombardi’s line: “A tie game is like kissing your sister.” We had a president who promised that with him in office we’d win so much we’d actually get tired of winning. I wanted to explore the possible ramifications of that kind of competitiveness. 


Years ago, I read an essay in The New Yorker about Blane Nordahl, known as the Silver Thief. He was so good he was never caught in the act. In other words, he was the best at what he did. I began researching burglars and I found Allen Golder, who was known as The Dinnertime Bandit, because he only struck at dinnertime when he knew everyone would be downstairs eating and since everyone was home, their valuables would be home, too. So, I had my protagonist—now all I had to do was come up with a plot.


HANK: In one of your many breathtaking endorsements, James Benn praises you, saying you “manage to make the reader care…about a master burglar and pathological narcissist. “How much fun was that to write, and what do you tell your students about making readers care?


CHARLES: For me, it’s great fun to write someone like Francis Hoyt because he’s so different from me (at least I hope he is). It forces me to get into the mind of someone who really is a “pathological narcissist,” to examine what motivates him. 


One of the things writers are often told is to write what you know, but what fun is that? I’d rather write what I don’t know, which means I have to use my imagination.


 Also, one of the comments editors and agents often make (and I rarely hear readers say this) is that the main character isn’t “likable.” I think that’s silly. I don’t read a book simply because I like the character or characters. I don’t really care if readers like someone like Francis Hoyt (although I’m sure some people do.) 


What I do care about is having the character be interesting and compelling enough that you want to spend time with him or her. In that since, readers do care about the character. Now, they might want him or her to get caught, to be brought to justice, but I think if you’ve created an “honest” character, you might even have the reader rooting for him or her to succeed, to thwart being caught. 


So, what I might tell my students is don’t worry about making a character likable, worry about making them interesting enough that you want to spend time with them. And make sure they don’t come off as stereotypes.


 I guarantee you that no one wakes up in the morning and says to themselves, “Hm, what can I do today that’s really evil?” No, instead they’re thinking, “what can I do today that will benefit me?” And thinking selfishly, the character is almost certain to do something that hurts someone else.


 Along the way, of course, part of the pathology is they might get pleasure out of someone else’s pain especially, as with Hoyt, they’re trying negate a very tough childhood. In that case, it’s not enough that he gets what he wants, it’s also necessary that he discomforts someone else. So, for instance, Hoyt does get immense pleasure out of making other people uncomfortable—and going into someone else’s space, uninvited, and taking something from them, is part of the thrill.


HANK: Oops. Before I forget – – tell us a little bit about this new book.


CHARLES: It’s not a novel I ever expected to write. It sprung from an earlier book I’d written, Second Story Man, which tells the story of Francis Hoyt, a master burglar whose claim to fame is that he’s never been caught in the act. But without giving too much away, by the end of that novel Hoyt has managed to avoid consequences for his actions. 


I had no intention of ever visiting Hoyt again, but when I finished my last novel, Canary in the Coal Mine, I started wondering what happens to him after Second Story Man ends. The result

of that wondering is Man on the Run, where the reader (and me) finds that Hoyt, now a fugitive, has moved from the East Coast. He’s also become involved with a former newspaper reporter who now has her own true crime podcast. At the same time, Hoyt is approached by a shady lawyer with a very low-risk opportunity to rob a “mob bank.” By the end of the book, these two things start to intersect.


HANK: Podcasts come into play in this novel. Do you listen to them? Why do you think they are such a phenomenon? Are they a new thing, do you think? Or back to old time radio? Do you think they have an inherent danger?


CHARLES: Thanks to the pandemic I became a true crime podcast devotee. As a former magazine journalist, I realized this is the perfect form for in-depth examinations of crimes and criminals. It didn’t take long for me to branch out from crime podcasts to others on just about any subject. I think they’re popular for many reasons, not the least of which is that it’s an addictive form of story-telling, that isn’t constricted by length or breadth. Plus, you can listen almost anywhere anytime. 


And yes, I do think it’s connected to old-time radio in that it tells a story while demanding of the listener a form of participation. What I mean by this is that podcasts demand attention. It’s not like you can do other things while you’re listening—as you might by playing music or having the news on in the background. It’s also more intimate—it’s just you and the podcast.


 I really can’t see any danger, except for the possibility that these amateur podcast sleuthing can get out of hand. And yet, at the same time, they seem to offer a real service in that they can often bring to attention injustices and possible flaws in our legal system. But the bottom-line is, the good ones provide good story-telling.


HANK: There’s such a cat and mouse element of this book… Tell us more about that, and why that’s so compelling.


CHARLES: Francis Hoyt has relocated to the West Coast where he learns that a podcaster, Dakota Richards, is preparing a series on his career. He tracks her down and instead of terrorizing her into dropping the project, he toys with her to the point where he dangles his possible cooperation. And so, there’s this back and forth between the two of them. Meanwhile, she goes through with her research on Hoyt by interviewing one of them men, retired Connecticut State investigator Charlie Floyd, who’s been after Hoyt for some time. 


And so, there’s this triangulation set up, each of the characters wanting something from the others. I hope it’s compelling because in a way you’re rooting for and against each character. The question becomes, who’s going to come out getting what they want. Or will anyone? 


HANK: Two more questions, okay? You are a revered writing teacher. What were some of your most memorable moments? 


CHARLES: That’s a tough question to answer because I never set out to teach. In fact, it was only because a friend of mine had an over-subscribed class and the Writer’s Voice wanted to add another section and she asked me if I’d do it.


At first, I said no, because I had no formal training in journalism—I was a magazine writer at the time—and so I had no idea what to teach. But she convinced me that since I was doing it, I could just teach what I was experiencing. I learned never to say no to anything and after that first class, as nervous as I was, I found that I liked it. 


What I especially liked was reading and hearing about my students’ lives—I guess I’m kind of a voyeur, a literary Peeping Tom. There are so many highlights, it’s hard to choose one.


But I guess the most famous is getting a call from a good friend who was a magazine editor asking me to take his assistant into one of my classes. I did. Lauren was in her early 20s and the first essay she workshopped in class was about her first day at work, and she called it, “The Devil Wears Prada.” 


For that first year she took class with me, she kept bringing in these essays and I kept telling her she had a book there and she kept saying, no. Finally, she saw the light. That’s why, in the Acknowledgments, she writes something like, “If you don’t like this book, blame Charles Salzberg.” 


But I’ve had so many students that’ve gone on to have their books (or articles and essays) published, like 80-something year-old Richard Willis who kept bringing in stories about growing up on a farm in Iowa during the Depression, which eventually became a fantastic book called Long Gone, or Vivian Conan, who’s been taking classes with me for well over 20 years and finally finished her memoir, Losing the Atmosphere, about suffering from Multiple Personality Disorder. 


When she first came into my class, she hardly spoke to anyone and refused to put her name on her work in an effort to maintain her privacy. She was in a class with Joy Behar (this was before she went on The View and became famous) and at the end of class people would give out copies of their work to be discussed the following week.


Joy picked up a copy, looked at it and said, “who’s is this? There’s no name on it.” Vivian raised her hand and Joy, without missing a beat, said, “Vivian, with all those people inside you, you couldn’t come up with one name?” Turned out, Vivian loved it and when her book came out a couple years ago, Joy gave it a nice blurb. But there are so many more great moments. I should pay them to let me teach the classes.


HANK: And philosophically: What have you learned about the writing world and the reading world? You’ve been so acclaimed, and so lauded and so awarded… Is writing still enjoyable for you, whatever “enjoyable” could mean? 


CHARLES: I’ve never really thought of writing being enjoyable. It’s not like I’ve ever said to myself, “hey, it’s about time for some fun, so I think I’ll sit down and write.” Like Dorothy Parker said, “I hate writing, but I love having written.” 


I don’t hate it. And in fact, when I’m in the middle of it, I actually like it, especially the rewriting part. But I can’t stop even if I wanted to because it defines me. 


If I’m not a writer, who am I? 


That’s why, I think, most writers don’t retire (one of the few who formally retired, was Philip Roth). As to what I’ve learned, it’s that everyone, no matter who it is, has a story to tell. Which doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a story that other people will want to read. 


The other thing I’ve learned is that no matter what happens in terms of progress, writing, telling a story no matter how you choose to tell it, will always be important. I don’t want to get too woo-woo here, but people need stories, either their own or other people’s stories because those stories give meaning and structure to life.


HANK:  Okay, one more. How do you want readers to feel when they finish Man on the Run? 


CHARLES: I’d be pretty grateful that they made it through 300 some odd pages without putting it down in disgust. But also hope they’ve been hooked by my story and that they connect with the characters on some level—they either like them or don’t. But most of all, that they derive some kind of pleasure and perhaps either learn something they didn’t know before, or find themselves thinking about something they haven’t thought about before.

Thanks so much for this opportunity and great questions!


HANK: Oh, see, Reds and Readers? Told you. So let’s talk about–podcasts! Do you listen to them\? Which ones? And why?


And a copy of MAN ON THE RUN to one lucky commenter. (earlier winners this week below!) 



Award-winning author Charles Salzberg,returns with a cat-and-mouse crime novel rife with psychological switchbacks in this “smart, sly and compelling, [novel]... the very definition of intelligent suspense.” –Lee Child. 

“Man on the Run” (April 18th, 2023, Down & Out Books) features ambitious characters drawn into a dangerous pursuit: Francis Hoyt, a fugitive master burglar, and Dakota Richards, a tenacious true crime podcaster gunning for an exclusive. Salzberg expertly weaves a dual perspective chase between the hunter and the hunted in this mob heist thriller. 


 And this week’s winners are: 

LIAR’S DICE: qnofdnile (get it? SO hilarious):

LOVE BETRAYAL MURDER  Melissa T.

THE HALF OF IT   Aprilbluetx


Email me at hank@hankphillippiryan.com with your info! And thank you so much for joining us at Jungle Red.


57 comments:

  1. Congratulations, Charles, on your newest book. Francis sounds like quite a character; I’m looking forward to reading the story.

    As for podcasts . . . haven’t listened to any, so I guess I don’t know what I might be missing . . . .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Joan. Try listening to one. Maybe start with the first season of Serial. Or there's a great podcast called Crimetown, and the first season is totally devoted to the mob influence in Rhode Island, especially Providence.

      Delete
  2. What a great premise for your new book, Charles. So much of what you said about writing and storytelling resonated with me, including, "If I'm not a writer, who am I?" I'm right there with you.

    I don't really listen to podcasts except for Julie Hennrikus's fabulous series of interviews with Sisters in Crime members. I do faithfully listen to several NPR shows, including The Moth - more storytelling! I either walk or play solitaire (with actual cards), because they demand active listening.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, agree, you really have to focus...much different than watching TV.

      Delete
    2. Thanks, Edit. And there are lots of podcasts that are just of general interest. Anything by Dan Taberski is great, especially Searching for Richard Simmons. And lots of the New York Times podcasts exams all kinds of interesting topics.

      Delete
  3. Congratulations on the new book, Charles. It sounds amazing!

    As for podcasts, they're like books. Too many of them and not enough time. I do enjoy listening to them in my car when I'm not listening to an audiobook... I'm just not in my car enough!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I'm just not in my car enough" :-) I'm not sure I've ever heard anyone say that! xx

      Delete
    2. Thanks, Annette. And you know, I never would have discovered them if it weren't for all the free time I had (meaning staying indoors) during the pandemic.

      Delete
  4. What an astounding person Charles is - beautifully expressed in this Hank Phillippi Ryan interview. He has such a unique approach to writing, it would be fascinating to be in one of his classes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aw, thank you. xxx And I have to say, I was just thinking the same thing about being in his classes!

      Delete
    2. Thanks, Becky! I wasn't going to teach during the pandemic, but if I don't then my students (all pretty good writers and many of them published) don't write unless they have a class to give them deadlines and the discipline to write. And so, it's hard for me to give it up now because I feel guilty...and Zoom has made it so much easier. I now have students Zooming in from Barcelona, Denver, New Orleans and California, which wasn't possible when I was only teaching in-person.

      Delete
  5. Congratulations on your new book, Charles. I have never thought about character the way you present it. Your students are very lucky! As far as everyone having a story, that I believe with all my heart. And, there are many people telling stories these days. We are so fortunate that we live in a time when we can choose the ones we want to read or listen to.

    I do not listen to podcasts. I've never really been a true crime junky. These days, audiobooks are my addiction and I listen constantly. Otherwise, I am reading, almost always choosing novels. I will be thinking about what you said about liking characters from now on when selecting books.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's such a great discussion--and absolutely, let's do a whole blog about it someday!

      Delete
    2. I don't know if this is still going on, but there was a newspaperman in the Northwest who wrote a column called something like, Everyone Has a Story. Each week, he'd open the telephone book, close his eyes, and put a pin in a name. Then he'd call that person and get their "story." It never failed, and he even did a story about a pony because of a young girl he spoke to when she answered the phone.

      Delete
    3. I dida TV feature just ike that in 1980-83. It was called Main Street, I worked at WSB-TV in Atlanta, and every Monday morning I would close my eyes and point to a big map of Georgia. Then my photographer and I would go there..and find a story. It was..transformative.

      Delete
    4. Susan C Shea here. What a great idea for someone as professionally and creatively curious as you, Hank!

      Delete
  6. Congrats on your newest book! I have never listened to a podcast but I am a true crime junkie. I would rather watch ID channel or read about them. My husband is a podcast junkie but he is into politics. Not my thing. Thank you for this chance at your giveaway. pgenest57 at aol dot com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YAY! Scroll down to the giveaway winners at the bottom!

      Delete
  7. Charles, congratulations on the new book!

    In answer to Hank's question about podcasts, I don't really listen to all that many on a regular basis. For podcasts about writing, I tend to just pick an episode of any random show that features an author I like.

    I do watch a couple of music related Youtube channels but the main music one I listen to here and there is the Pub Songs podcast by Celtic musician Marc Gunn.

    And for a long time now I have listened to podcasts about some of my favorite science fiction shows. Most of them have ceased production now so the only one I'm listening to is called Tuning into Sci-Fi TV and I've been listening to that one for years now. I'm a part of their message board and occasionally contribute feedback messages that get used as part of the show.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great stores Charles! So interesting about your students.
    As far as podcasts, I primarily listen to NPR podcasts when I walk. I like to listen to Shankar Vedantem's Hidden Brain.
    Hank: qnofdnile? Something about the nile or in de-nile (denial). Or qn of the Nile?
    Help need hints or the answer!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm a podcast fiend. SO much out there, so many people discussing stuff I want to know about, even if I didn't realise it. Science stuff, mystery stuff, bookish stuff, history stuff... Even ghostly stuff. Though rarely true crime (unless it's Lucy Worsley presenting it). So many generous people keeping me company while I walk, quilt, knit, excercise, drive...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, who's Lucy Worsley? Am I hopelessly out of it?

      Delete
    2. Seems like there's a podcast for everyone and everything.

      Delete
    3. Lucy Worsley - the absolute go-to historical TV presenter on all things royal, social, mysterious, Tudor, Georgian, Victorian… I could go on and on. Perhaps just Google her?

      Delete
  10. Such a great interview! Thanks, Hank for bringing Charles to us! I'm with you, Charles, on winning and competition. Paradoxically, suffering and loss have helped me learn to experience joy and to become more compassionate. I'm really interested in your character, Francis Hoyt, but will look for Second Story Man first.

    I don't regularly listen to podcasts, but for awhile my son was really into the BBC podcast, In Our Time with Melvyn Bragg. I heard a number of episodes while driving long stretches of highway in Eastern Oregon. I just checked and there are 985 episodes. Bragg hosts experts and discusses something from history or science each week. Here are the last few titles: The Battle of Crecy, Cnut, A Room of One's Own, Solon the Lawgiver. Such a variety of topics and so interesting. Plus Bragg's north of England accent reminds me of my dad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, that sounds fascinating! You'll always be surprised at what you learn.

      Delete
  11. Congratulations, Charles, on your new book. And your classes sound great.

    I have never listened to a podcast, but I liked the comparison to one of the old radio shows. I grew up on those, and it's true: you had to really listen and use your imagination.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Loved them! The old-fashioned production really comes through--but that's part of the fun!

      Delete
    2. It's like another world.

      Delete
  12. Congratulations on the new book, Charles. Making a pathological narcissist sympathetic is quite a feat! I'm looking forward to reading Man on the Run!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Jean. lt's a tricky tightrope to walk because he is all those things, but he also has to be interesting enough to keep readers reading. I think I pulled that off in Second Story Man, but let's hope I did it with this one.

      Delete
  13. Charles is a new author to me. What an amazing interview, Hank! Thank you! Adding yet another author’s books to my TBR list. I don’t listen to podcasts, but an author you recently interviewed gave me some ideas of podcasts to listen to. I love The Landmark Books and World Landmark Books. I love Nancy Drew and The Hardy Boys, along with Encyclopedia Brown. Thanks again, Hank!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And thank you for reading it, Pamela.

      Delete
    2. Aww..thank you! My complete pleasure!

      Delete

  14. Very interesting.
    BUT it really needs editing.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Man on the Run sounds captivating and intriguing. A fascinating interview. Yes, I do listen to podcasts which I find very interesting and worthwhile. Many types. Books, lives and human interest.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Man on the Run sounds very intriguing! And I love podcasts! I listen all the the time!

    ReplyDelete
  17. I enjoyed this wonderful interview and Man on the Run would be a real treasure to enjoy. Podcasts resonate with me since I enjoy listening to radio shows.

    ReplyDelete
  18. And they really are addictive--at least the good ones are.

    ReplyDelete
  19. From Pat S. - Congratulations on your new book, Charles. Like Gillian above, I will start with Second Story Man first; Francis sounds like an intriguing character.
    I occasionally listen to podcasts while I am walking my dog (my favorite is Kelly Corrigan Wonders. I always learn something new). My son has tried to get me to listen to some of the history podcasts he likes, but I think there’s a generation gap. He likes the ones where there are three people in “the booth” which means there’s a lot of talking over each other and phrases that Boomer Mom doesn’t get. But I will keep trying!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Charles, I love your descriptions of the challenges along the way, *even* for a write with a distinguished writing career before you attacked crime fiction. Congratulations on the new book! I'm a huge fan of audio books but podcasts, not so much. There's just not enough time in the day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's such a weird observation--and so true. You have to know about it, and then think of it, then find it, and then sit and listen to it. Is there a TV guide for podcasts? :-)

      Delete
    2. Thanks, Hallie. And as for enough hours, there might be except why do they have to pass so darn quick?

      Delete
  21. What an enjoyable interview! Thanks, Hank and Charles. As for podcasts, I just started listening to one about the English language that I like: "Something Rhymes with Purple." But I confess that most of the time I listen to audiobooks instead of podcasts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Keep trying Kim, I'm betting you'll find a few that'll fascinate you. And many are very clever. Dan Taberski does one called 9/12 in which he isolates several examples of something that occurred one day after the attack and how it was affected by that attack. So, for instance, (and I won't ruin this for you), the pub date of a particular magazine was supposed to be on 9/11 but, for obvious reasons it wasn't quite right.

      Delete
  22. Susan C Shea here. I've already copied and pasted Charles' comments about this business agents and editors give you about how a main character has to be likeable. It's a polite tug of war I've been having in slow motion about a manuscript I love that's as much about a bad man as it is about the characters determined to catch up with him. Those whom I work with want him to be far in the background, but I think he's too juicy and interesting. With this interview, I am encouraged to keep pressing forward! Thanks.

    ReplyDelete