Monday, November 10, 2025

Villains? Realistic or Cruella-er the better?

We have a winner! Lisa from Long Beach, you are the winner of Heather Webber's THE FORGET-ME-NOT LIBRARY! You can email her at: booksbyheather at gmail dot com.  CONGRATS!!!

HALLIE EPHRON: Many of us who like to read (and write) crime fiction are fascinated by villains. (This lovely young woman is Lizzie Borden.)


Do we think of our villains as criminal masterminds? As misguided mortals under the influence? Delusional maniacs??

When I was writing my first mystery series (the Dr. Peter Zak mysteries) and coauthoring them with a real-life forensic neuropsychologist, I asked him (Donald Davidoff) about the defendants he evaluated and testified on behalf of in court.

He said that, based on his experience, the average criminal defendant is a "poor schlub," not a criminal mastermind. In out of their depth. Wrong place, wrong time...

Last week's news about the heist of crown jewels at the Louvre seems to bear that out. Reporting in the New York Times called the thieves "sloppy" after pulling off what seemed like a well-planned robbery in one of the world’s most famous museums in broad daylight."

Apparently in beating their hasty retreat, they left behind a mountain of incriminating evidence. A glove. A jeweled crown that they dropped on their way out. The truck that they tried unsuccessfully to set on fire. All told, the evidence yelded 150 forensic samples.

All of that led to arrests of suspects whose DNA was already on file because of their criminal histories.

Today's question: How do you think of your villains – as brilliant and evil, fatally flawed, or poor schlubs?

RHYS BOWEN: I think the villain is often the most interesting character. I rarely create evil people, true villains. I’m more interested in what would make an ordinary person, you or me, be backed into a corner so desperately that killing is the only way out. 

I often feel sorry for them
and regret when they are caught at the end of the book.

I’ve never written a true criminal master mind, the sort who delights in evil, like we have learned about some of the Nazis in WWII, smiling as they operate without anesthetic. 

I’m actually trying to remember if I’ve ever written a truly bad person. I’d say it was fear more than anything that makes my villains kill. Fear of being found out. Or sometimes a warped sense of entitlement. 

But no Doctor Evils for me. Although a caper with some inept jewel thieves would be delicious to write!

JENN McKINLAY: Great question, Hallie. I tend to focus on my victims. They’re not characters that I’m sad to see go. 

The villain, however, is usually as Rhys mentioned someone who’s ordinary but in a situation where they think murder is the only way out. 

Of course, that makes them as bad as the person they murdered, so… I do think most criminals are dumb. That’s why they get caught.

HANK PHILLIPPI RYAN: I never know who the bad guy is at the beginning, I just see who evolves based on what they want, and how far they will go to get it, and what will happen if they fail. Are they “bad’? No, they just want something, and think it’s the right and good and fair thing for them to want.

Some guy who robs a bank because it’s an easy way to get money is gonna get caught. And my villains don’t do things like that. So my villains are not schlubs, they are smart people who think the rules don't apply to them. And that they deserve to have what the want. Because they have been wronged somehow. That the world has been unfair to them, and now it’s their turn.

Are they criminal masterminds? Never. I’m trying to think if there really is such a thing, outside of the comics.

Possibly in the corporate world?

LUCY BURDETTE: What Rhys said about wondering what drives a person to the most extreme act hit home for me

I don’t start with a villain, but I do start with the inciting event that launches the story–and that of course leads to the villain. Villains are my writing weakness, so I’m always working on filling them out. Why? Why? Why?

Hank’s comments led me to thinking about politics today, how polarized we are, and how certain each side is that their view is right. I think we can take a lesson for our villains from that!

DEBORAH CROMBIE: When my hubby worked in law enforcement he always said that most of the criminals they dealt with were really stupid. I suspect we don't know much about the ones who aren't stupid, because they don't get caught.

I don't generally write villains as evil masterminds. They can be caught up in an obsession, or unable to see any other way out of a predicament–usually of their own making.

HALLIE: I think the one thing we have in common is we agree with that old saw, "The villain is the hero of their own story." What they do has to make some kind of SENSE to them, and grow out of something in their past that they're trying to "get right this time." (Just like our protagonists.) 

But the truth is, writing the villain as an ordinary guy just isn't that compelling.

Do you like to read villains that are realistically drawn, or larger than life and scary?

25 comments:

  1. Realistically-drawn villains are probably a better "fit" in a story, but sometimes having a larger-than-life villain makes for an interesting narrative. Either way, as long as it works with the story being told, I'm okay with it . . . .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're so right, Joan - the pull is in both directions

      Delete
  2. I just want the villains to be caught and pay for their crime.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So you're not a fan of noir... or where the villain has good reasons for doing what they do? Maybe that gets down to the definition of "crime"

      Delete
  3. I just returned from Crime Bake where the discussion of Art Heists is swimming in my head. The expert told us that most of them are carried out by ordinary criminals and he was very convincing.

    I actually prefer the bad guys in books to be kind of ordinary so they don't invade my dreams. Lee Child has created a few over-the-top, evil, mastermind criminals who still give me nightmares and I don't want to add to that list.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am sorry to have missed the art heists Judy! It's such a hot topic these days, but it always makes me think of Lupin. he had such a great backstory!

      Delete
    2. "Ordinary criminals" - I'd love to hear more about what was meant by that.

      Delete
  4. Interesting question, Hallie. I think I prefer ordinary because they can usually be handily caught. I am interested in why they do what they do. What brought them to make these choices. I have often felt that truly evil characters and real-life folks, are not in touch with reality at all and can probably plan and execute a crime much more effectively because they see everyone and everything as expendable as long as they reach their goal. I also suspect that some of my thoughts are reflective of the times in which we live where it appears villains have taken over so we have a front row seat to what true villainy looks like. It ain't pretty. I want ordinary, please. -- Victoria

    ReplyDelete
  5. I prefer realistically drawn villains and some understanding of their motivations. Once when I was on a ridealong, we were pulled off lunch for a bank robbery call. We were the second unit to arrive, and received updated information that a witness had seen this guy duck into an alley and change shirts. We spotted him walking in the next block. Mike pulled the cruiser up in front of him, jumped out of the car with his gun drawn and told the guy to stop. He stopped, cover units arrived and they arrested him. We took him downtown to jail. He thanked us for treating him well (not sure what he was expecting) He was just a poor schlub with a drug habit. I'll never forget the pictures of his kids in his wallet.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I’m 76 years old, old enough to have known a lot of people, some of whom ended up in the criminal justice system. Some were among my coworkers. A couple of them were my neighbors at one point or another. At least one was a childhood playmate. They were all ordinary people who made bad choices, and then had to live with the consequences. At least one ended up dying from suicide. To my knowledge, I’ve never known a criminal mastermind. One of the people I mentioned carried out an elaborate ruse for a number of years, but eventually got caught. I think it was just pure luck that he didn’t get caught right away. I’ve only ever met one person that I thought was truly evil, but I don’t know what ever happened to him.
    DebRo

    ReplyDelete
  7. Give me realistically drawn any day. My villains are desperate, or furious, or terrified enough to cross the line into crime, but not larger-than-life scary.

    We have a cruel, over-the-top villain in power right now, and that's enough for me. That story can't end too soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Which makes me wonder what makes "true crime" so popular right now?

      Delete
    2. I missed saying hi to you at Crime Bake, Hallie (I thought I'd see you at the Celia gathering). I am sorry about that!

      Delete
    3. Edith - cruel is the perfect description. I remember years ago his own sister (a judge) said he same thing.

      Delete
  8. It is most certainly true, as plenty of people say, that most criminals are very stupid. Or at least very desperate. The stupid comes to mind when you hear those stories about the criminal who were caught because they either posted about or actually livestreamed the crime they were committing. And they were then shocked when the cops caught them!

    Hell, in my town, there was a case where four people were arrested for the murder of a rival "gang" member (the fact that my town was supposedly big enough for TWO gangs was something that kind of made me chuckle to be honest).

    The cops caught two of them pretty fast and brought them back to the scene of the crime. One of those two kept swearing up and down in the back of the cruiser that he wasn't there, he wasn't there. The way I heard it, so I can't be 100% sure it is true, when the cops went into the store, the guy said, "Hey, I think I left my phone in there, can you get it for me?" The cop responded, "Son, you ain't going to be needing that phone for a while." Darwinian, no?

    When you keep villains in the story somewhat realistic, it keeps the story grounded. But you know what? Sometimes you want a Doctor Evil for a villain too. You want someone who can match wits with a Great Detective instead of someone who is easily outwitted. I think it depends on the kind of story you are writing, the setting and the characters that will be chasing down the killer. I don't expect Jessica Fletcher to be jumping through a glass window with blazing fire from an Uzi to finally bring an end to Professor Moriarty. But I don't expect that Mitch Rapp or Jack Reacher to be catching the hapless dumbass by sitting in a used bookstore eating cookies while reading the latest Murder, She Wrote novel either.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I will gladly take either. I just want good story. Perhaps the greatest villain (to my mind; your mileage may differ) was Count Fosco from THE WOMAN IN WHITE by Wilkie Collins, coincidently, last night I finished Virginia Fieto's VICTORIAN PSYCHO, which features one of the most original villains going. Winifred Notty is an unstable governess who has left a series of dead bodies behind her. Or did she? Erratic and hallucinogenic, she kills. maims, and deceives her way through a Victorian estate in a tale that is part satire and part horror, and imbued with Dickensian-named characters -- even her own name, Notty...is she "naughty?" or is she so named because she "nods off" into fantasy? or is it a reference to Enid Blyton's character Noddy, a fictional toy from a fantasy world? Winifed Notty, much like Count Fosco, is a villain who will stay with me for the rest of my life.
    The reader is forced to choose which she is, Dodgson's Alice Liddell, or Hitchcock's Norman Bates?

    ReplyDelete
  10. I don't think there is one reason why someone commits a crime - there are so many reasons. Some are psycho/sociopaths, some desperate, some have no conscious, opportunistic, some self-centered/egotistical. There are different crimes they feel justified in committing - fraud, murder, theft, assault, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  11. No scary villains for me, please. There are enough of them in the real world.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The Louvre heist, which at first sounded like the perfect crime, disappointingly--to mystery fans, at least--turned out to be a stupid criminals story after all. Guess the perps never heard the motto "haste makes waste". They left a mess of true incompetence.

    Real life serial killers, as opposed to fictional ones who keep bumping people off to cover their original crimes, seem to me the most evil. Jeffrey Dahmer, for instance. Or the Boston Strangler, and the Cincinnati Strangler before him, both targeting older women. Coldly searching for their next victims.

    Like others, I have lost my taste for such stories, real or fictional. Enough true evil is all around as in real life at the moment.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I’ve thought a lot about what a compelling reason would be for a villain to do something – – what is it that someone could want enough to do something deadly and illegal? I have to say, it all came down to power and control . In all ranges of the spectrum – – from disappointed “love” to the acquisition of money. The bad guy thinks life has not been fair to them, and they deserve to get what they want. And the decision of how to do it is not because they’re bad, but because they’re smart. No matter the actual Intelligence of a criminal, they THINK they’re smart.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Having talked with police officials, yes, most criminals are stupid. Those are not compelling to write, though. They have to give the sleuth some challenge, right? Being caught because you posted on Instagram twenty minutes after robbing a jewelry store and showing off your loot doesn't make for a good book.

    I think my villains tend to be along Hank's line - they think what they do is "right" somehow because they're entitled to...something. Money, power, whatever. They've been slighted, or cut down, or deprived in some way and they're not gonna take it anymore.

    ReplyDelete