Thursday, June 11, 2026

Trademarks by Jenn McKinlay

 JENN McKINLAY: What a wacky week in the book community! A book blogger trademarked the phrase "hot girls read" and the book community has lost their ever lovin' fluffin' minds. And rightly so. 

Etsy Shop: Dust Jacket Goods

One glance at etsy.com and I can see hundreds of vendors use that phrase to sell booky merch. So to trademark it is a slap in the face of all the other book merch vendors who've been using the phrase on their notepads, t-shirts, stickers, and such for years. 

How is blocking these vendors from using that phrase going to impact the woman who trademarked it? At a guess, not well. Is she really going to spend her days demanding the platform take down all the other vendors by waving her trademark papers? Does she not have anything better to do? At all? 

While the book community can never agree on anything, such as favorite book, character, adaptation, and such, if someone goes after one of them, they will get all of them coming for them. Seriously, book lovers are "we ride at dawn" defenders of all bookdom.

But back to the broader discussion of trademarked phrases. In answer to the question "what are some of the wackiest phrases that have been trademarked?" Google returned this:

  • "Let's get ready to rumble!": Sportscaster Michael Buffer successfully trademarked this iconic boxing phrase in 1992, allowing him to legally control its use in entertainment, events, and merchandise. 
  • "That's Hot": Paris Hilton secured the rights to her signature catchphrase in 2007 and even used it to successfully sue Hallmark for printing it on greeting cards without her permission. 
  • "This Sick Beat": During the 1989 era, Taylor Swift filed a famous trademark on this lyric, along with "Party Like It's 1989". 
  • "Tiger Blood": Charlie Sheen filed 22 trademark applications in 2011 to lock down his famous interview soundbites, including "Duh, Winning" and "Vatican Assassin". 
  • "Tebowing": Former NFL quarterback Tim Tebow trademarked the act of kneeling and praying in a pose that became a viral internet meme. 
  • "Let's roll": The phrase—famously spoken by Todd Beamer on hijacked United Flight 93 on September 11, 2001—was trademarked by his foundation to protect it and sell merchandise with proceeds going to charity. 
The only one I agree with is Michael Buffer because the man uses it in his work every single match, so it feels legit. The others? Not so much. But here lies the problem, it's all rather subjective isn't it? The person in charge of your application at the trademark office is the one deciding if it gets trademarked or not. What if they're having a bad day? Or a good day? Or they hate whatever it is you're trying to trademark? 
There's actually a person who trademarked the phrase "boy mom." Yes, I'm serious and as a boy mom, I'm bewildered as to WHY a person would do such a thing? Are you really trying to corner the market on "boy mom" merch? Phooey. I'll go to an online pay on demand print shop and design whatever I want myself so thanks but no thanks.

So, Reds and Readers, how do we feel about this trademark trend? Yay or nay or what the heck?

65 comments:

  1. Of course, hot girls read! Right now I am at Bradley Field, yes it's 3:30 am. I am waiting for my flight to Michigan for my aunt's 90th. birthday party. Driving me here, Irwin said, "Pay the extra $200 next time and take a flight at a reasonable time." He might have a point. Duncan Donuts opens at 4:00. Coffee!!
    Anyway, I don't understand how people can trademark phrases, it's hard enough to protect real ideas. Anyway, this "hot girl" has packed lots of books!
    Hope you are feeling better, Jenn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good morning Judy! I think Irwin's right:). Have a wonderful time at the party.

      Delete
    2. Having made the weird hour drives to Bradley…Irwin is right! Enjoy the trip and the birthday party, Judy. Elisabeth

      Delete
    3. Judy, The last time I flew out of Bradley, I drove up the night before and stayed at one of the airport hotels. They drove me to the airport in the morning. My car was safe with them while I was away. When I returned, they picked me up at the airport, while my car waited for me at the hotel, properly cooled off in the summer heat. I don’t know why it took me so many years to think to do this! Then the pandemic came and I haven’t flown anywhere.

      DebRo

      Delete
    4. Ha! I was up at 3:00 AM and flew out of Phoenix at 5:00 AM - I'm in Charlotte now, getting ready to fly to Hartford. The joys of air travel. Have a wonderful trip, Judy!

      Delete
    5. Lisa in Long BeachJune 11, 2026 at 1:16 PM

      I think flying out of PHX at oh-dark-thirty in the summer just makes sense.

      One of the best things about retirement has been having the time to stay at a hotel airport before early/after late flights.

      Delete
  2. My initial thought was to say, "That's all rather silly;" generally, it feels a bit mean-spirited . . . but then I thought about writers and AI and all of that mess and figured that, if I were a writer, I might really consider getting a trademark/copyright for something like my series characters simply to keep them away from AI . . . .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Times are complicated aren't they Joan? It's hard for me to imagine why I'd need to trademark my characters--copyright definitely! But I can only keep so much in my poor brain:)

      Delete
    2. That's an interesting thought Joan - I wonder if authors of trademarked and copyrighted movies/plays/books/music can sue AI if they use their material or characters names. Jenn I think you had trouble with this?

      Delete
    3. Oh, good point. I hadn't thought of the AI complication. Sheesh.

      Delete
  3. I hadn't heard about the hot girls read kerfuffle, but I think trademarking phrases is stupid. It's language, and language belongs to everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  4. From Celia: I'm clutching my head in despair, and I'm against this type of pettiness. Luckily I am very lightly attached to social media and have chosen only to blog with JRW whose kindness and encouragement has been an absolute gift from this community.
    On a more serious note it seems that a trademark whose job is to identify a serious business (such as Duncan Donuts whose colored heading stands out calling us to coffee) has no place in an AI catch phrase world simply leading to more 'stolen' materials such as the time authors have just to spend protecting their work from AI etc. can't help thinking of the current phrases we use daily, Edith is correct, it's stupid and language belongs to us all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. Although, Taco Bell did sue a small taco shop who trademarked "taco Tuesday" decades ago as their catch phrase so that they could use it, too. Petty goes both ways, I guess.

      Delete
  5. Trademarks are liable to start lawsuits! Just as an aside, my family had a clean products website with some of our own products but mostly other green brands. We named our products EcoAble and applied for a patent. A company that sold wholesale products called Ecolab notified us of their intent to sue us over the name because we had the same letters in our name. Different products, different market, made no difference, we had to change our products name. Makes no sense but we had to do it or pay tens of thousands in legal costs!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's such a crazy story! Helps shed some light on the dark side. With book titles, there is no copyrighting. So an author could choose a title that's been used over and over. (Not thinking that would be a smart move however!)

      Delete
    2. I dunno Lucy, writing a lame book titled "And then there were none by Agatha Crispie" might earn a few pennies for the fraudster.

      Delete
    3. This happened to Hub's band back in the 90's, luckily they had a bigger following and were able to prove they had the name Zen Lunatics first.

      Delete
    4. What a great name for a band, Jenn.

      Delete
    5. I find it disconcerting when two books could have the same title. If I’ve already read one of them I’d probably not read the other! Elisabeth

      Delete
  6. Writers, there is a simple way to get around this. In any romantic/sexual/hanky-panky situation, have the female wear a bowler, fedora, Stetson, Scottish tam, or other headwear. To may knowledge, no one has trademarked "hat girls read."

    ReplyDelete
  7. Being able to trademark something like "Hot Girls Read" seems kind of stupid.

    I suppose, like in the case of Michael Buffer, if a phrase is associated with you it makes sense to try to trademark it. It's language yes but the phrasing of those individual words gives you at least a notion of the trademark BS.

    But for all the other phrases that Jenn listed, the fact they were allowed to become officially trademarked seems more like a payoff was made to the person in the trademark office than common sense was being applied that day.

    To think that useless sacks of mostly water like Paris Hilton, Charlie Sheen and Tim Tebow own trademarks makes me want to scream.

    Oh, and there's another phrase that got a lot of notice for being trademarked. Basketball legend Pat Riley got one for the phrase "three-peat", if I remember right.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. By the way, according to an article on People Magazine's website, the controversy was so intense that the woman has surrendered the trademark (though the paperwork is apparently still going through on that). - Article Link - https://people.com/why-is-the-term-hot-girls-read-trademarked-all-about-the-controversy-sweeping-booktok-11993298

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the update Jay. She seems so remorseful!
      Not! She's sorry she had so much backlash that would affected her business.

      Delete
    3. Oh, love the update. I had a feeling it wasn't going to go her way.

      Delete
  8. I might be able to understand trademarking an original image combined with a specific phrase, maybe. Maybe... I wonder if the 'hot girls read' trademarker thought she was being super clever and making her merch super exclusive with a trademarked phrase...clearly, that hasn't worked for her...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh and I see from Jay's second comment that it has well and truly backfired on her...

      Delete
    2. Common sense is not as common as you'd think.

      Delete
  9. Trademarking a common phrase seems a bit much. The picture on the T-shirt looks like my mom when she was young, so thanks for that! Just yesterday I read a story in The Contrarian about a drag queen named Pattie Gonia who is being sued by the outdoor gear manufacturer Patagonia. The suit is making Patagonia look petty and ridiculous and giving Pattie a way larger audience. (She is quite something by the way) https://www.contrariannews.org/p/pattie-gonia-drag-queen-name-lawsuit

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I saw this news item and had to laugh. Has Patagonia not realized that Argentina and Chile might sue them for using the name as well? :-) Cheers for Pattie Gonia!

      Delete
    2. I saw that! I'm definitely Team Pattie! And Patagonia? Dead to me.

      Delete
    3. Probably their lawyers didn't have enough to do...

      Delete
  10. I've been racking my brain trying to recall some of the phrases Ohio State University has trademarked over the past few years. Since my husband is a proud graduate of Ohio University (Ohio's FIRST land-grant university by 67 years, he is quick to point out) it is usually a sore point for him. OU has successfully fought some of the trademarks, but not all of them.

    But somehow a big, soulless behemoth like OSU doing something stupid feels more predictable and less upsetting than an individual. I'm glad to hear that the reaction has led her to a belated attack of conscience.

    BTW, thanks, Jay, for the link to the People article. I enjoyed reading their full take on it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really think greed has warped all of our institutions. Sheesh.

      Delete
  11. Jenn, good grief! Some people would find any reason to file a lawsuit. I never knew about trademarking a common phrase until it was discussed here on Jungle Red Writers. I just cannot wrap my brain around that idea of trademarking a common phrase. I do not know what to say about this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "One finds it difficult to hazard a conjecture, sir."
      "You mean imagination boggles?"
      "Yes, sir."
      "I inspected my imagination. He was right. It boggled."
      The butler is always right, in this hilarious series.

      Delete
  12. Way back in 2018, a romance writer trademarked the word 'cocky' and told other authors they couldn't use it in their titles. She had books like 'Cocky Cowboy'. As I recall, it didn't go well for her either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just snort, Flora. I can see why it didn't.

      Delete
    2. Oh, I remember that. Quite the dust up as I recall.

      Delete
  13. Nay, nay, nay in trademarking language. What is wrong with people!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Maybe we should trademark Jungle Red Writers?? :-)

    ReplyDelete
  15. Debs, good point I was also wondering about JRW so I Googled and found this info.

    "Yes, the individual blog posts, essays, and written content published on the Jungle Red Writers blog are protected by copyright.
    The Blog Name: Names, titles, and short phrases (like "Jungle Red Writers") cannot be copyrighted. They may be protected under trademark law, but copyright applies only to the text and creative content itself.
    Fair Use & Ideas: You can freely discuss the ideas mentioned on the blog, as ideas cannot be copyrighted. However, you cannot copy or reproduce the exact wording of their articles without permission.
    The Phrase Origin: The name itself is a famous pop culture reference to the 1939 film The Women "Jungle Red" is the name of a fictional nail polish

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The founding JRW's were smart to protect their work by copyrighting it.

      Delete
  16. Language mutates by the minute and by the person. Trying to Trademark a phrase is like trying to hold onto sunshine, says me. Let's roll with this eh? However watch out for the tiger blood on the floor. such silliness in the 21st century.

    ReplyDelete
  17. My reaction is get over it. That's probably trademarked. How about you're not that important to trademark an expression you didn't invent and others have been using for years. It sounds like a case of greed.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Although it was too common a phrase in general and there's zero evidence that the musician John Denver ever tried to copyright or trademark it, I will always equate the words "FAR OUT!" with him. He used it all the time during interviews but especially during concerts where fans like myself would practically spiral into joyous orbit each and every time he shouted out that phrase to the audience. He certainly had his darker moments on a personal level but "Far Out!" fit him like a glove on a professional level. He was known to be quite receptive to fans...kind and personable...and I will always remember the time I had the pleasure of unexpectedly meeting him. He could not have been more joyous, attentive and genteel in his mannerisms...a firm two-handed handshake as well as words of gratitude and appreciation... and I would have not been surprised if somehow "Far Out" made its way into products related to him as a musician and humanitarian.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love that. Humility and graciousness are seriously underrated qualities.

      Delete
  19. Is Duncan Donuts related to the other Dunkin' Donuts?

    ReplyDelete