My problem is: having books. Having them. Having way too many of them. Way way way too many of them.
Here is an actual pile. This is in the exercise room. No one sees it but us, luckily.
And no, way too many books is not an oxymoron or a paradox. It is a question of shelf space versus things on the shelf.
There are bookshelves, often floor to ceiling, throughout our house. We have a library! And I love seeing the books. But I am in the shelfspace red, Reds and Readers. Way way way in the red.
Some of these books have to go. I know exactly where to take them to be best for the community.
But to which ones will I bid farewell?
Here is another actual pile. (This is on the stairway to the third floor--no one sees it but us...)
Here are the categories:
Books I love? (I keep.)
Signed books. (Keep. Yes. Mostly. Argh. Well, maybe.)
What about a signed a book by someone I don’t know? Or don’t care about?
Books by people I love that are not signed.
Books I could get any minute of any day if I wanted them.
Books that someone gave me but I don’t know who.
Books I did not or would not enjoy.
Advance reader copies.
How do you decide what books to keep? Which categories do you have?
And I know I said more on the mass market paperback issue. So, apparently those are vanishing from the publishing landscape. They’re not selling enough, so the answer is simply to stop trying to sell them. What do you think about that?
So: mass-market books, yes or no? And how do you decide what of your accumulated stash to keep?
Keep lovely illustrated books, reference books I need for my writing, antique books, books signed by friends or writers who mean something to me.
All other books can go.
If I wanted to read fiction again I’d get it on Kindle. Many reference books can now be looked up online.
The rest went to Friends of the Library.
As for paperbacks: I always felt mm were hard to read. Small print. They don’t stay open easily. But… new paperbacks are expensive and thus out of reach for some readers. Books have become too expensive for impulse buys. And $14.99 for Kindle is way too much but that’s another discussion!
LUCY BURDETTE: I too, am deeply in the red on this books issue. Don't get John started on how I still keep ordering and buying more. I keep books by my friends, books I have loved, and books that I might possibly read in the future. That last category is where there can be a little wiggle room.
At this point, I justify the overabundance of books as decor. Who can argue with that?
Some of these books have to go. I know exactly where to take them to be best for the community.
But to which ones will I bid farewell?
Here is another actual pile. (This is on the stairway to the third floor--no one sees it but us...)
Here are the categories:
Books I love? (I keep.)
Signed books. (Keep. Yes. Mostly. Argh. Well, maybe.)
What about a signed a book by someone I don’t know? Or don’t care about?
Books by people I love that are not signed.
Books I could get any minute of any day if I wanted them.
Books that someone gave me but I don’t know who.
Books I did not or would not enjoy.
Advance reader copies.
How do you decide what books to keep? Which categories do you have?
And I know I said more on the mass market paperback issue. So, apparently those are vanishing from the publishing landscape. They’re not selling enough, so the answer is simply to stop trying to sell them. What do you think about that?
So: mass-market books, yes or no? And how do you decide what of your accumulated stash to keep?
Keep lovely illustrated books, reference books I need for my writing, antique books, books signed by friends or writers who mean something to me.
All other books can go.
If I wanted to read fiction again I’d get it on Kindle. Many reference books can now be looked up online.
The rest went to Friends of the Library.
As for paperbacks: I always felt mm were hard to read. Small print. They don’t stay open easily. But… new paperbacks are expensive and thus out of reach for some readers. Books have become too expensive for impulse buys. And $14.99 for Kindle is way too much but that’s another discussion!
LUCY BURDETTE: I too, am deeply in the red on this books issue. Don't get John started on how I still keep ordering and buying more. I keep books by my friends, books I have loved, and books that I might possibly read in the future. That last category is where there can be a little wiggle room.
As my tastes change, maybe I can cull a few out. As you might expect, I find it much easier to pick out which of John’s books can be donated to the library lol. (Ooh, that might be a good topic for a future chat – does your partner share your reading taste?)
I’m not paying too much attention to the mass market question because every couple of years, the publishing industry makes another decision about those books or what sells or what will never sell again. My career was launched by mass market paperback, so I do feel fondness and loyalty for them. And I do have boxes and box of them stored up for some event in the future.
HALLIE EPHRON: Most books I don't keep. Our local library (Go Milton Public Library!) has a wonderful bookstore packed with donated books and I donate my giveaways there. It's easier to do it when I know it's going to someone else who'll read it.
For me to keep a book it needs to be a reference (like Phillip Lopate's "To Show and To Tell" about writing personal essays or "The Business of Being a Writer" by Jane Friedman). Or a book that I flat-out loved ("Water for Elephants"). Or a classic (I've got all of Rex Stout's Nero Wolfe mysteries, Dorothy Sayers's Lord Peter Wimseys, and all of the Sherlock Holmes novels.
JENN McKINLAY: I keep nothing. Well, almost nothing. One copy of each of my books, books signed by author friends or authors I admire, of course, and the very small collection of foreign pop-up books (whenever I travel I buy a children’s pop-up book published in the language of the country I am visiting). And then I do have my reference collection, lots of witchcraft books for the Witches of Dubious Origin, milliner books for the Hat Shop Mysteries, etc.
Why do I keep nothing? Because the Hub is a book hoarder! I have one floor to ceiling shelving unit in our library while the Hub has FIVE. *sigh* I force him to purge twice a year just so the library remains manageable. Oy.
DEBORAH CROMBIE: Oh, this is hard. But I’m less sentimental than I used to be. I keep research books, books by friends and books signed by friends, and some favorite hardbacks. I also have a couple of shelves of childhood books, and a couple of shelves of by now very vintage sci-fi/fantasy mass markets. These should probably go to Half Price Books where perhaps they will be snapped up by a collector. But I’m not going to reread them, or any of the paperback favorite mysteries I’ve hung on to over the years. The paper’s yellowed and the font too small to read comfortably.
My bigger problem is the towering to-read piles, but that is another subject…
I don’t know how I feel about the (supposed) demise of the mass market paperback. On the one hand I hate to see a more affordable means of reading bite the dust, but on the other hand I very seldom buy them myself, so I get the thinking. I’ll spend a few more dollars for trade paper or for an ebook, so…
JULIA SPENCER-FLEMING: Apparently, I’m keeping all the books everyone else is donating! I mean, I do try to be reasonably prompt about passing hardcovers on. And ARCs often go to the Swap Shop, so hopefully some other reader can discover a new-to-them author. But honestly, this is where having a big ‘ole house does me wrong. I have bookcases in the family room. I have small built-in shelves in the kitchen for cookbooks, etc. The library has multiple bookshelves. My office has bookcases. The living room has book cases. Every. Single. Bedroom. Has bookshelves, and I have slim ones in each of the hallway landings!I’m not paying too much attention to the mass market question because every couple of years, the publishing industry makes another decision about those books or what sells or what will never sell again. My career was launched by mass market paperback, so I do feel fondness and loyalty for them. And I do have boxes and box of them stored up for some event in the future.
HALLIE EPHRON: Most books I don't keep. Our local library (Go Milton Public Library!) has a wonderful bookstore packed with donated books and I donate my giveaways there. It's easier to do it when I know it's going to someone else who'll read it.
For me to keep a book it needs to be a reference (like Phillip Lopate's "To Show and To Tell" about writing personal essays or "The Business of Being a Writer" by Jane Friedman). Or a book that I flat-out loved ("Water for Elephants"). Or a classic (I've got all of Rex Stout's Nero Wolfe mysteries, Dorothy Sayers's Lord Peter Wimseys, and all of the Sherlock Holmes novels.
JENN McKINLAY: I keep nothing. Well, almost nothing. One copy of each of my books, books signed by author friends or authors I admire, of course, and the very small collection of foreign pop-up books (whenever I travel I buy a children’s pop-up book published in the language of the country I am visiting). And then I do have my reference collection, lots of witchcraft books for the Witches of Dubious Origin, milliner books for the Hat Shop Mysteries, etc.
Why do I keep nothing? Because the Hub is a book hoarder! I have one floor to ceiling shelving unit in our library while the Hub has FIVE. *sigh* I force him to purge twice a year just so the library remains manageable. Oy.
DEBORAH CROMBIE: Oh, this is hard. But I’m less sentimental than I used to be. I keep research books, books by friends and books signed by friends, and some favorite hardbacks. I also have a couple of shelves of childhood books, and a couple of shelves of by now very vintage sci-fi/fantasy mass markets. These should probably go to Half Price Books where perhaps they will be snapped up by a collector. But I’m not going to reread them, or any of the paperback favorite mysteries I’ve hung on to over the years. The paper’s yellowed and the font too small to read comfortably.
My bigger problem is the towering to-read piles, but that is another subject…
I don’t know how I feel about the (supposed) demise of the mass market paperback. On the one hand I hate to see a more affordable means of reading bite the dust, but on the other hand I very seldom buy them myself, so I get the thinking. I’ll spend a few more dollars for trade paper or for an ebook, so…
At this point, I justify the overabundance of books as decor. Who can argue with that?