Sunday, August 24, 2025

Ellen Crosby--Deeds Left Undone

DEBORAH CROMBIE: I am such a fan of Ellen Crosby's books, and I await the publication of a new novel in her Virgina Wine Country series with eager anticipation, so you know I devoured the latest, DEEDS LEFT UNDONE, as soon as I got my copy! And this cover! Don't you just want to dive into it?




I love Lucie Montgomery and her family and friends, and I'm fascinated by the details of the winemaking business. Not to mention that no one propels you into a mystery like Ellen, and DEEDS LEFT UNDONE is no exception! Ellen presents her characters, and the reader, with a moral dilemma. Here she tells us more.


Writing about Moral Gray Issues

by Ellen Crosby


Maybe it’s the journalist in me, but almost every book I’ve written has its origins in either something I’ve heard (a story on NPR, for example) or something I’ve read in a magazine or newspaper—so the story is always rooted in truth and reality. Deeds Left Undone gets its title from a quote by Harriet Beecher Stowe: The bitterest tears shed over graves are for words left unsaid and deeds left undone. And the first chapter is based on a February 7, 2004 front page article in The Washington Post, my hometown newspaper, titled ‘A Radical Plan to Save a Rural Oasis: Don’t Pave the Roads.’

My wine country mysteries are set in a real place—Loudoun County, Virginia and, more specifically, the village of Middleburg, a quintessential Norman Rockwell small town that is located in the well-to-do heart of Virginia’s horse and hunt country. It is charming, bucolic, and picture-postcard. The streets are named for the signers of the Declaration of Independence who were friends of the man who founded the town in 1787. The fight to keep the rural roads unpaved in Loudoun is a fierce one. Locals—especially anyone who rides, hunts, or owns horses, which includes a lot of folks—want to keep this unspoiled paradise the way it has always been since before the founding of the town. Developers and other locals—quite often people who recently moved to the area because they fell in love with its beauty and charm—argue that the anti-pavers are standing in the way of progress. Also, unpaved roads can be impassable in bad weather, cause flat tires and broken axels, and result in too many trips to the car wash.

The pro-paving group cites the example of another Virginia county—Rappahannock County—where the board of supervisors has stubbornly refused to allow any commercial development. The result has been services cut to the absolute minimum, a housing shortage, and a stagnant economy. The anti-pavers point to adjoining Culpeper County where that board of supervisors is allowing a 116-acre data center housing 2.2 million square feet of massive structures with concrete walls up to 70 feet high to be built on farmland adjacent to Civil War battlegrounds. Two more enormous data center sites have already been approved.  When completed, they will suck up more than 10 times the entire county’s current electricity usage. Cooling the plants will put a strain on the area’s water supply. Already the wells of local homeowners are starting to go dry, there is not enough electricity to go around, and Culpeper’s once-beautiful vistas are slowly being erased. Nevertheless the chairman of the Culpeper Board of Supervisors is unrepentant: the county needs the tax dollars which are essential for the region’s economic development.

This battle—with soaring tempers, angry words, and a lot of money at stake—is clearly fertile ground for a murder or two; doing the research for Deeds Left Undone was especially fascinating. The arguments in favor of economic development and paving the roads were obvious. But to understand why the non-pavers believed as they did, a ninety-two-year-old friend with the energy of someone half her age and known to most of the horse-and-hunt community as Grammy brought me to a steeplechase race, an event called “Twilight Jumpers” and one of the largest cattle auctions in the region. As expected, one of the big reasons was “because we like it this way and it’s better for the horses.” Also, the unspoiled beauty of this lovely part of Virginia was a major part of its attraction and charm. Why ruin it? Did Loudoun want to turn into another Culpeper County, selling out for easy money but destroying everything that had made it such a desirable place to live to begin with?

I don’t know the answer to the question whether the roads should be paved or unpaved, whether there’s a middle ground that will appease both sides, and who should get to define “progress”—whatever that is. But I do like writing about moral gray areas and exploring both sides of an issue so that my readers can think about it and perhaps decide for themselves how they feel.

So I’m curious about what you Reds readers think: pave the roads because you can’t stop progress forever or leave them unpaved to preserve their unspoiled natural beauty? And why?


DEBS: Here's more about DEEDS LEFT UNDONE--

When Paul Merchant, the husband of Lucie Montgomery’s winery manager, is found dead at the bottom of his swimming pool, the police rule it an accident. But Paul’s wife insists he was murdered because of his leadership of Don’t Pave Paradise, a conservation group lobbying to keep the region’s beautiful country roads unpaved. Plus, six weeks ago Paul’s predecessor also died under mysterious circumstances. As Lucie takes on the work of the conservationists, she discovers a link to the recent deaths and the death of a beautiful heiress in a fire eighty years ago. Plus she learns firsthand there are individuals who will do anything—including committing murder—to, as the song goes, pave paradise and turn it into a parking lot. 


And about Ellen!

For many years she worked as a freelance journalist in the US and while living overseas in London, Moscow, and Geneva, Switzerland before turning to writing fiction full time. Her last job as a stringer was as a regional feature writer for The Washington Post, covering many of the places where her Wine Country mysteries are set. 

DEBS: I have so many questions for Ellen. She just spent the week teaching at Chautauqua and I hoping she'll share some highlights. She's posted some fabulous photos on her socials!

And of course I'm always nagging her for news of an new Sophie Medina book...

I'm sure, dear readers, that you have questions, too!

16 comments:

  1. Congratulations, Ellen, on your newest book . . . the dilemma at the heart of the story certainly does set the stage for a confrontation --- I'm looking forward to reading this.

    Pave or don't pave? Middle ground? I'm thinking that there ought to be a compromise . . . perhaps paving the roads "in town" where the businesses are located and leaving the country roads unpaved? But there's also a part of me that thinks the "newcomers" shouldn't come to town and barely get settled before they're demanding change. If the town was perfect for those living there in the beginning, then they should not be coming in and demanding change before they've even unpacked. After all, what were the qualities that drew them to the town in the first place?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like Joan's compromise: pave in town, where it could affect business, and leave the outlying areas unpaved if the residents have been happy with unpaved roads. Meanwhile, her remark about people moving in and then complaining reminded me that in Sacramento, developers wiped out rice paddies and sunflower fields after buying up land on the way to the airport to create new subdivisions. Then after people bought homes in the new subdivisions, they complained about the noise planes made flying in and flying out. Seriously.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SMH about the Sacramento subdivisions.

      Delete
    2. In Connecticut, developers purchase farm land and construct big fancy neighborhoods. In the spring, the newcomers complain about the smells from the farm next door that has been there since 1850.

      Delete
  3. Congratulations on the new book, Ellen! I agree that the pave/no pave controversy is a perfect breeding ground for (fictional) murder.

    ReplyDelete
  4. ELLEN: I'm looking forward to reading this newest Lucie book.

    As for the pave/no pave controversy, we have a similar situation in one Ottawa ON housing area but the issue is with sidewalks.

    The posh Rockcliffe Park historic park neighbourhood is characterized by narrow curving roads without curbs or sidewalks, large lots and gardens, and houses set within a lush green landscape. The elite residents (homes for 150 ambassadors, former Prime Ministers) like it that way. But the City of Ottawa recently approved the addition of sidewalks for safety reasons, and to be consistent with the rest of the city.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. P.S. Our walking group has a route in the Rockcliffe Park area. We do it once a month. I think it is not safe for 20+ people to be walking on the roads, even on a weekday morning. But of course the Rockcliffe Park residents are angry that this upcoming change is being imposed on them!

      Delete
  5. Welcome back Ellen! I remember staying at the Culpepper Inn years ago for my niece's graduation. I wonder if it was in the same county? This is a terrible struggle a lot of places...Key West is always being tugged and squeezed between the developers and the folks who mourn the way it used to be. We'll never get back to that, but I'd hate to see the town lose its charm and walkability.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the cruise ship controversy in Key West is similar to the unpaved roads debate.

      Delete
  6. Congratulations Ellen on your recent book release.

    I agree with Joan...pave in town where needed but leave the country roads alone

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Ellen. I think this debate is money versus lifestyle and natural resources. Mostly money wins. In my area of Connecticut, we have a reservoir system that is enviable. The quality and taste of our water are pure and natural. When our quasi- governmental Metropolitan District Commission made a deal to sell water from our prized system to a a water bottling company at a deeply discounted price, the uproar could be heard in California. Yes, it would mean more funds in the system, but come on! With the crazy weather patterns of recent years, either drought or flood, who can predict when that company will be pulling more out than the system can handle? Is giving them a discount fair to everyone else? Some say the next World War will be fought over water.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apparently Mark Twain *didn’t* say “ Whiskey is for drinking, water is for fighting over,” but the sentiment still holds.

      Delete
  8. Congrats! And what is Sophie Medina up to these days?
    I live in the close-in Cincinnati suburbs, which had a huge fight with Duke Energy 2016-2021 about building a thirteen-mile natural gas pipeline through a densely populated area. The purported reason? "To supply much-needed natural gas to our Hamilton County residents." The REAL reason? To connect an existing pipeline in a rural area north of Cincinnati to a terminal on the Ohio River, thereby completing an interstate chain of pipelines delivering natural gas from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico. Lies, manipulations, powerful mall and hospital lobbies put the pipeline through our area, which included a church, elementary school, and the village center with our rec facilities. This was an interstate project, which should have been subject to FEDERAL regulations. Thanks to the Ohio utilities commission and supreme court, the project went through. And now our area lives in a blast zone and we, the Duke Energy customers, get to pay for it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh Margaret, I feel for you! And fear for all of us who care about history and the environment--once despoiled and torn down, these can never be recaptured or replaced.

      Delete
  9. Hank Phillippi RyanAugust 24, 2025 at 9:28 AM

    Welcome! It is so great to see you here! In my little town, there’s a scourge of developers tearing down single-family Victorian homes and putting in two and three and four unit condos instead. They are not ugly, individually, and anywhere else they would be just fine, but I mourn the loss of the beautiful old houses.

    ReplyDelete
  10. GREAT book topic. Can’t wait to read it. I used to live in Virginia and spent some time in that area. It is beautiful and still has that unspoiled feel about it. As a country gal, I prefer things left as natural as possible. I am already mad enough at the human race for the damage it has caused our beautiful planet. There seems to be no end to the desire of some to pave, build, displace, use, abuse, discard… I feel fortunate to live in Maine where (for the most part) people who live here care about the environment and living closer to nature.

    ReplyDelete