Sunday, May 12, 2024

Can The Book Publishing Process be Re-envisioned?


HANK PHILLIPPI RYAN: Let’s talk about…books. It's certainly a puzzle for anyone who's ever written a book, or tried to sell a book, and probably on the minds of wise people who read books: how does a book get published in the first place?

Who decides which books are publisher-worthy and which ones are not? Many authors have turned to self-publishing, and many have simply given up.

Best-selling and award-winning author Henriette Lazaridis, along with author Anjali Mitter Duva, has been thinking about this, too. With some pretty groundbreaking results.

HANK: First, from your research, has publishing always been like this? I remember one of my favorite movies, The Man Who Invented Christmas, showed Charles Dickens fighting with his agent and his publisher about his future after the failure of Bleak House. (Or something like that.) And how Dickens was in danger of not having any more books published. I mean, fiction, but... That got me thinking, too, about how fascinating it is that publishing today is so cutthroat and so competitive and so hard line.

 


HENRIETTE LAZARIDIS: Publishing didn’t always look the way it does now. It wasn’t always populated by the Big Five publishers at one end of the spectrum and hundreds of small and micro presses and self-publishers on the other end. Nor was it the case that excellent writers struggled to secure a book deal, while the market made room for celebrity memoirs and self-help treatises. Things used to be different. Just not in the way we all tend to think.

HANK: How’d it work before?

HENRIETTE: Before, say, 1880, there were many different ways for books to reach readers. Books were sold in department stores. There were door-to-door sales and subscriptions. Publishers doubled as booksellers. Publishing costs were frequently paid for by the authors themselves. The concept of a monolithic publishing mode–in which the author secures an agent who then secures a publisher who then sells copies of the books in bookstores only? That concept is relatively new.

HANK: You can see why that would theoretically work, though-- there's an agent/gatekeeper who chooses the best books, whatever that means, and then they funnel those to the publisher who chooses, theoretically, the best of the best. It kind of makes sense.

HENRIETTE: Yes, but the system is fairly inflexible. The “traditional” publishing industry is often resistant to acknowledging it comes from a tradition of innovation. What we’re seeing now, in this time of the rise of hybrid presses, cooperative presses, books selling in non-bookstore markets: all of this should be welcomed without a value judgment. Just because it’s different, that doesn’t mean it’s wrong.

HANK: And I think people's thinking about traditional publishing is changing, too, while still embracing it, and now being open to other pathways.




  HENRIETTE: I think it can certainly be done another way. And as an author, I'm looking at it from the viewpoint of view of content producer, right? There are no books without us authors. So now, along with Anjali Mitter Duva, we’ve co-founded Galiot Press, a new publishing company that re-envisions the entire publishing process, from how books are selected and acquired, to how they’re produced and distributed, even to the scope of the reading experience the customer will have.


HANK: You and I have talked about this, before, and some of the things I think are so --I mean, for instance, how many times have we heard our colleagues gripe and worry about how long it takes to get an answer to our submissions?

HENRIETTE: These days, it’s common for writers pitching agents (and agents pitching editors) to hear no response at all from the people they’ve contacted. There’s a reason for this. Agents are overwhelmed with queries from an ever-growing population of writers; and editors are overwhelmed with the demands of their positions, which increasingly involve far more than editing.

 

HANK: How else could it be done?

 

HENRIETTE: Well, we’re adopting a workflow system that limits the number of queries we take in each week to the time we know we have available for them. Like the restaurant industry, from whom we borrowed this reservation approach, we won’t just open our doors and serve anyone and everyone all the time. Galiot Press won’t ghost you because we won’t ever have an overwhelming number of queries to consider.

 


HANK: I can't wait to hear how you're going to handle that! Will you still keep the agent model?

HENRIETTE: Agents perform an invaluable service to their clients–from negotiating contracts, to editing, to securing ancillary rights, and more. But plenty of excellent writers with excellent books struggle to find the one agent who will enthusiastically take them on. We certainly believe in curation–or else we wouldn’t be running our own press–but we believe in access, too. So we will accept queries from agented and un-agented authors alike, with no bias to distinguish between the two groups.

HANK: Another thing we hear a lot about is print run; how publishers decide how many books to print, and that reflects an investment, which in turn reflects a commitment. Are you changing that too?

HENRIETTE: Traditional publishing estimates a number of copies to print ahead of on-sale day–copies which are shipped to bookstores that have ordered them. These copies may be shipped back to the publisher if they don’t sell, in which case the publisher must buy back the copies. It’s a system that can be catastrophic for micro and small presses. It’s also a system that is terrible for the environment: so much packaging, shipping, fuel, and, often, over-printing and then destruction of books.

Publishing doesn’t need to be doing this in the 21st century. Print-on-demand technology allows a copy to be printed and drop-shipped directly to the customer (or to the bookstore, if it’s ordered from there). There are no returns, and no extra shipping. And let’s remember that e-books have even less environmental impact and an even speedier delivery to the awaiting reader. For all these reasons, Galiot Press will rely on print-on-demand as well as e-books.


HANK: I heard someone say once that book world depends on the concept of “the same but different.” That people want a book that feels comfortable and familiar, but is just a different story. And those “same but different” books are the ones that will succeed

HENRIETTE: The whole process is a guess–unless you’re publishing a book that’s very similar to one you’ve published before, with a similar market. To take the uncertainty out of the print-run guesswork, publishers are more likely to acquire books that repeat formulas or types they’ve sold already. They counteract the financial risk of the print run (and its up-front expense) by being artistically conservative. But we’re doing the opposite. Without the up-front commitment of a print run, we can be free-er with the books we publish, favoring excellent books that are unique rather than familiar.

HANK: Do you think this will all work? What’s your timetable? Can people submit to you now? And you must have an innovative distribution plan, too---because the book to reader connection is the key to it all! So where can writers go to find out more?

 

HENRIETTE: We’re open to submissions starting on May 20, but anyone interested can visit our website now and learn more about the submissions system. We’ll be looking for the first three books for our fall collection, which we’ll publish in Fall of 2025. Our distribution plan is, in fact, innovative! And our website has tons more information about our mission, our systems, and our plans. You can also sign up for our Substack newsletter where we write about our process along the way at http://galiotpress.substack.com.


HANK: Reds and writers, have you felt frustrated in your search for a publisher? And readers, do you ever think about where your books come from? And which books you may never have seen because of the system itself?

 

What questions do you have for Henriette and Anjali?


 

Henriette Lazaridis’s second novel Terra Nova was called “ingenious” and “provocative” by The New York Times and her debut The Clover House was a Boston Globe bestseller. Her latest novel, Last Days in Plaka, came out in April 2024 and was a Good Morning America Buzz pick. Her short work has appeared in Elle, The New York Times, New England Review, and more. She runs the Krouna Writing Workshop in northern Greece and is a co-founder of Galiot Press, ushering in a sea change in publishing.

 



Anjali Mitter Duva is an Indian American writer, planner, and publisher who was raised in France. She is the author of Faint Promise of Rain, shortlisted for a William Saroyan International Prize for fiction. Anjali is a co-founder of Galiot Press and a former fiction Co-Editor at Solstice Literary Magazine. She co-founded and runs the Arlington Author Salon, and is also a co-founder of the Indian kathak dance non-profit Chhandika. Anjali was educated at Brown University and MIT.


56 comments:

  1. I must admit that I have not thought too much about the intricacies of the publishing industry . . . but I'm grateful that books always seem to be there for me to read. Best of luck, Henriette and Anjali . . . may your innovative ideas for publishing bring you much success.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hank Phillippi RyanMay 12, 2024 at 12:05 PM

      Yes, we are thrilled you are a happy reader!

      Delete
  2. Fascinating interview. I look forward to following Galiot Press's progress. And I think huge percentage of writers (myself included) have felt frustration at various stages of the publishing process. If there is such a thing as a "perfect" publisher, I have yet to find them.

    Best wishes, Anjali and Henriette.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hank Phillippi RyanMay 12, 2024 at 12:06 PM

      Yes, it can be a real morass—and so frustrating. Interesting if there is another way!

      Delete
    2. Throughout publishing, people are working really hard with great intentions. We feel we've come up with a model that puts our own good intentions and energy to work in making things better for authors, and readers.

      Delete
  3. It's a tricky business, for sure. I've had successes with the traditional model, and a fair share of frustrations, too. The latest veered me into indy publishing my latest book, which was hard, because it's my thirty-third novel.

    Best of luck with your new press!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Edith, thank you for sharing your experiences. Diana

      Delete
    2. Hank Phillippi RyanMay 12, 2024 at 12:07 PM

      Yes it is always a journey— but it doesn’t always makes sense. To the authors, at least!

      Delete
  4. Ladies, I wish you great success. Your ideas for turning the publishing model on its head are long overdue.

    As a self-published author 30 years ago I was appalled at the weird system of outlets ordering masses of books, shipping paid by me, then returning them in boxes, sometimes damaged by the store or seller. And just getting them printed was a nightmare, taking delivery of more than 5,000 books at once! Luckily, we had someplace to store them, but it was a bizarre situation. Libraries then were an especially difficult fulfillment: they paid full price, but usually only ordered a single volume, and required shipping in individual packages. It was pricey to ship then; today it would be outrageously expensive.

    Print-on-demand has been around for at least two decades. I'm glad to see a publisher embracing that technology. While e-publishing has been quite successful, so many still want a physical book. I'm curious to know how you plan to do this for brick and mortar stores, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Karen in Ohio. That was a weird system. Wonder if Authors donate books to the library or if the library has to play for the books all the time?

      Diana

      Delete
    2. Donations mean lost income, in a business that is already hard to make a living from. Libraries are generally funded by tax dollars. I donated copies to our local library.

      Delete
    3. Hank Phillippi RyanMay 12, 2024 at 12:08 PM

      Yes, it’s fascinating! And all of that info is on their website.

      Delete
    4. Ah, thanks, Hank. It's a complicated issue, and requires creativity, for sure.

      Delete
    5. Yes, I think this is so fascinating!

      Delete
    6. Congratulations and thanks. I have finished one cozy academic mystery, and I'm working on a second case for the two main characters in the same setting (except the time). But since I'm self-under-employed, much of my time at the PC is taken up with looking for more work, not looking for agents. Meanwhile, the second book is slow going. So that leaves me with questions about series books: Would you want to start a series to get loyalty? Would you expect book two to be beyond an uncertain 100 pages before accepting that it will be a series?

      Delete
    7. Margaret, for now, we're not aiming to publish novels that are part of a series. But I can't say that will never happen!

      Delete
  5. It never occurred to me that unsold books are destroyed. What a shame! Best of luck with this exciting venture!~Emily Dame

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, it happens more often than we like to think...

      Delete
    2. Yes, and it's such a shame to think of all that paper just pulped, not even donated to communities that might want the books.

      Delete
  6. Henriette and Anjali, congratulations and wishing your publishing adventure much success! The print-on-demand model is the way to go for sure, I agree. And I'm glad you are open to non-agented writers.

    Currently, I'm part of a loose group of about 25 writers--our goal is to find venues to do readings, to sell our books. Many of the authors are self-published, some have small press publishers, or have/had agents and traditional publishers--we're a very mixed group. Anyone--and I do mean anyone--can self-publish a book with a print-on-demand service, but your vision will mean getting some books out there--some fine authors--who might get lost in the cracks of a traditional publishing model.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, it's an interesting option, right? Especially for authors who do not want to do it all themselves...

      Delete
  7. Henriette, this is fascinating! My very best wishes to you and Anjali on this new venture. I hope you bring books to life that deserve to be read, but might not otherwise make it to the world. I wonder how you balance your writing with this big project?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, it'll be SO interesting. And great question!

      Delete
    2. Each of us has always had other work ongoing besides our writing (for me, it's been a decent teaching commitment), so we're used to finding writing time around our main commitment. Wish us luck!

      Delete
  8. Henriette and Anjali, today's blog is fascinating. I wish you much success with your venture.
    I am retired and these days I read constantly. While I do use my library, I indulge myself in buying books every week, mostly e-books and audiobooks. I think about the authors all of the time, especially since I found this blog several years ago. Authors must promote themselves and authors like Hank create venues that help promote other authors. My question is how Galiot will promote its authors, in particular, those making their debut?
    I wish you success! Now I will go and look for your books.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, what a great question...love that. (and aw, thank you!)

      Delete
  9. Thank you, Henriette and Anjali for giving us this insider's perspective. SO MUCH has changed since I shopped my first published book and "self-published" was anathema. So many more opportunities to get published but also a much more crowded field.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Hallie! We do think it's great that new publishing modes have opened up lately. There are options out there. It's a question of authors being informed about their choices, and about the pros and cons of each model and the extent to which they can achieve success (in their own terms) in the one they're considering.

      Delete
  10. From Celia: This is a ground breaking idea, Congratulations to you both. I am here as a reader and have found mys

    ReplyDelete
  11. From Celia: WOW blogger is now self publishing. Somehow it decided I had written enough above. But to continue. Over the past four years for a number of reasons I have turned to reading on my phone. Yes I do still buy the real thing but with the amount of book suggestions which arrive daily via email I get so many choices to consider I live my local library but their choice of news books - popular best sellers - isn’t my first choice. I am most interested in the environmental impact of all the publishing impact. I am culling my library now and I hate to think of my books in a landfill.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Celia, I would hate to see books go to a landfill, When I was at University, I recall the English Department had a bin where you could donate old unwanted books to be donated to another country.

      I wonder if your local public library would be happy to have your donated books for their library sales. And there are Little Free Libraries too.

      Diana

      Delete
    2. Diana, you will be horrified to know that many libraries in the past couple decades, in order to make space, have destroyed millions of old books. The first library I heard of doing this was in San Francisco, if I remember correctly. It could have been LA, but I don't think so. My late sister-in-law was the children's librarian at the Sausalito Library, and she had passed away a couple of years before. I remember thinking how upset she would have been about destroying tens of thousands of books.

      Delete
    3. Celia, I think it's great you read on your phone. It's so easy to decry the phone as if the device itself were the problem (and, ok, sure, we know there are some addictive elements to our screens). But in fact, you can read a great book on your phone, and it's convenient, and doesn't add as much of a carbon footprint as a physical book. Anjali and I both love physical books, but we also appreciate the advantages of other forms of the written word.

      Delete
    4. Hank Phillippi RyanMay 13, 2024 at 9:16 AM

      I read in every platform… And I love reading on my phone. I always have it with me! And there was always a good book. It’s also a great way to read samples.

      Delete
  12. Congratulations on your new venture! So wonderful for authors to have more options.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Henriette and Anjali, welcome to Junlge Red Writers and congratulations on your new publishing endeavour.

    Since I have not even started the process of submitting my novel since it is Still a WIP, I would say that at the moment, I am a Reader.

    As a Reader, sometimes I would read a book with typos or poorly written grammar and I wonder “How on earth did this book get published”? Sometimes I notice several novels seem to have similar new to me word and I wonder if these niovels are by the same publisher or several publishers who share the same editor? Or perhaps that word is popular at the time of publication ?

    Diana

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Isn't that strange how words sometimes come into fashion? Plots, too.

      Delete
  14. Impressive! congratulations on your publishing launch. I'm not ready yet, but have bookmarked your site. So refreshing.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I have always been a prolific reader and have discovered many authors who are ‘niche’ writers. They may specialize in a certain genre and therefore not be known to a lot of people who might enjoy their books but don’t know about them because the advertising focus is so narrow.
    I have also been disappointed when an author writes a series I really enjoy and then find that the publisher has cancelled it because they aren’t selling enough copies or they don’t feel the interest in that style or theme is still there. The author is then, if they get the rights to the series, fortunate enough to sign on with another publisher and is able to continue with it for quite a while longer because there are people who do want more.
    Another issue is that sometimes an author is forced to use a pseudonym or look for another publisher because they are told that they are only known for one style of writing or theme and there wouldn’t be an interest if they were to write something different.
    If I like the way someone writes, I will look for that author even if they go on to something else.
    Sometimes I even like the new offerings even more than the previous one.
    I am also disappointed in the number of errors I come across. They include a wide range such as continuity, misspellings, grammar and multiple uses of the same words or expressions.
    I was reading a book where the main character says ‘I balled my hands at my sides’ twice within nine pages. The expression is unique and certainly stood out to me. This was written by a writer who has written many books. I don’t understand why it wasn’t caught.
    All these problems seem to have become more common and, for me, really takes away from the story. How would you address these issues?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While it's hard to know how an infelicity of writing found its way into a published book, I can say that both Anjali and I are exacting in our approach to language. We each come to English a little from the outside (me from Greek, which I spoke first, and Anjali from French which she spoke while growing up), and this has made us particularly careful of style and usage in English prose.

      Delete
  16. Debra H. GoldsteinMay 12, 2024 at 1:25 PM

    Congrats on this new endeavor. During the next few years, the evolution of the industry will be very interesting. Kudos for your new model.

    ReplyDelete
  17. What I found, as a many times traditionally published author with smaller companies, is that distribution is all. Even a book with great reviews and a waiting audience will suffer if the distribution isn't simple, goes everywhere, has enthusiastic distribution salespeople, and is super easy for the bookstore to work with. I'm not sure how print on demand works within those traditional preferences?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great question! I remember early on someone saying to be: It's ALL about distribution. I was such a newbie, I didn't know what that meant. Now I do.

      Delete
    2. Our books will be available in bookstores, but will also be available in other non-bookstore venues through partnerships with other kinds of businesses.

      Delete
  18. This is amazing! So many new and indie presses are rising out of the new technology that has made publishing much more cost effective. I love it! All the luck inthe world on your endeavor, ladies.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Henriette and Anjali, congratulations on your endeavor! I was just trying to explain to my son-in-law the craziness of the traditional publishing mode, and he said, "Bookstores can send back unsold books!!! And get their money back??" It's about time the industry joined the 21st century, and I hope you will be leading the way!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, it's a consignment business. Very weird.

      Delete
    2. Yup, every book is a venture capital project, and then the books distributed to bookstores are a consignment operation!

      Delete
  20. This was a fascinating and useful post! Thank you.

    ReplyDelete